Equity with loss or higher financing amount?

  • Erstellt am 2016-08-26 14:14:30

roadrun87

2016-08-26 14:14:30
  • #1
Hello everyone, I am facing the following decision.

A few years ago, I was persuaded to take out a Wohnriester building savings contract without understanding the background. I do not want the deferred taxation.

Now I have two options:

Option 1: I let the Wohnriester building savings contract be paid out (canceled) and have to repay the government subsidy as well as tax benefits. That would cost me about €1700 and free up €8000 in equity.

Option 2: I convert the Wohnriester building savings contract into a retirement product and let it mostly rest. Then the money will become a pension, which I must also tax, but more manageable than with the housing promotion account.

I am very undecided and would like to hear opinions.
 

Alex85

2016-08-26 16:11:48
  • #2
For me, an important factor would be whether I urgently rely on the equity, e.g. because financing would otherwise not come about and/or the higher installment would be a problem without the equity. With 8 TEUR, I would assume that this is not the case. I would also remove the 8 TEUR from the contract if the alternative would be an (expensive) follow-up financing or if I still urgently needed a correspondingly high buffer. It would also be interesting to see whether 8 TEUR more equity achieves a cheaper loan, so that the financing conditions improve. The decision would then be even easier if it turns out that the improved conditions would compensate for the €1,700 loss.
 

roadrun87

2016-08-26 16:28:55
  • #3
The financing is arranged with and without this capital. Regarding the [Beleihung] it is a good point. I will have both scenarios calculated.
 

Alex85

2016-08-26 17:07:46
  • #4


Consider how important this is to you. An end with horror is better than finding no end at all.

Another factor is whether you definitely want to do Riester. That means no Wohnriester, but instead finding and contributing to another Riester product? Is that the plan?
 

roadrun87

2016-08-26 18:19:34
  • #5
You would tend to terminate the contract ?

The plan is to have a cost-wise predictable future. The idea to convert it into another Riester product only came up to somehow save costs.
 

roadrun87

2016-08-26 18:36:40
  • #6
I just checked the exact amounts. I would have to pay back €144 for 2014 and €233 for 2015 in taxes. The credit amounts to €9629 minus €1368.10 allowance and the €377 taxes, which would leave me with €7884. Riester-free for free use.
 

Similar topics
28.03.2011Can we afford to build a house without equity?14
03.04.2012Buying a house without equity?29
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
02.07.2013Residential Riester for Home Purchase Financing - Who Has Experience?16
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
18.12.2015Financing unequal equity ratios of unmarried partners24
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
21.04.2016Is financing with land and equity possible like this?20
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
06.03.2018Building savings contract and Wohnriester - Where is the catch here?28
21.11.2018Financing with a building savings contract?18
24.09.2020Financing of 400k with 60-120k equity capital through a combination of BANK/KfW/savings contract22
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
26.06.2021How much equity is needed for home purchase financing?15
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48

Oben