Energy Saving Certificate KfW55 - Target KfW40 - Question: Steps & Costs

  • Erstellt am 2016-04-19 13:26:35

world-e

2016-04-25 10:25:14
  • #1
I created the PDFs from u-wert.net. But that is only supposed to reproduce the wall construction from the energy saving certificate. And that's why I asked for constructive opinions on it. And unconstructive opinions like "so ein Murks" don't help anyone here and can be saved.
 

Bauexperte

2016-04-25 10:33:30
  • #2
I was also initially tempted to adopt a different tone; we are neither Green nor Blue here

On the other hand, you yourself are not exactly helpful in your communication behavior; every necessary piece of information has to be "pulled out of you." You furthermore ask all over many forums; you do not contribute yourself or your knowledge in any way. So you are _only_ acting as a sponge.

Rübe must have noticed that too; in this respect, his reaction to you is still moderate.

Rhenish greetings
 

Rübe1

2016-04-25 16:20:07
  • #3
Construction expert, forget green, there's only advertising left there. In the blue (where the green ones went) there were clear indications of the problem areas. I'll add one here as well: First hour: wheelbase, for example. Then, a 12mm OSB as a diaphragm, that's already daring. There are supposed to be people who claim you can't achieve airtightness with less than 18mm. If you came up with this as a private individual, as I said, then you can't know better. If this comes from your "professionals," then it would be dramatic.
 

Rübe1

2016-04-25 16:23:12
  • #4
Addendum, just read this now, two fools one thought:

Quote:

"and if there are a few serious timber construction and building physics flaws in the structure and materials, the program is only partly to blame.
 
Oben