Mottenhausen
2018-10-30 20:50:35
- #1
The consultant is right.
First: say goodbye to the 75%. They result from an interplay of roof pitch, knee wall, story height, and gable length (the further the eaves sides move apart, the larger the roof triangle becomes). However, all the values are more or less already defined in the development plan, making it difficult to have 75% of the upper floor without a slope. Unless you build with a cross house/cross gable. I estimate that with a max. 33° roof pitch and the given eaves heights, you end up somewhere around 60%.
One should perhaps also keep the background of the B-Plan in mind: it ensures that the houses nestle closely to the slope and thus all plots get good light and visibility conditions. Pushing the limits: ok! But 2 full stories are not wanted for good reason.
First: say goodbye to the 75%. They result from an interplay of roof pitch, knee wall, story height, and gable length (the further the eaves sides move apart, the larger the roof triangle becomes). However, all the values are more or less already defined in the development plan, making it difficult to have 75% of the upper floor without a slope. Unless you build with a cross house/cross gable. I estimate that with a max. 33° roof pitch and the given eaves heights, you end up somewhere around 60%.
One should perhaps also keep the background of the B-Plan in mind: it ensures that the houses nestle closely to the slope and thus all plots get good light and visibility conditions. Pushing the limits: ok! But 2 full stories are not wanted for good reason.