Drywall vs plaster on masonry

Hello. Tomorrow we have our first consultation with Viebrockhaus. Further appointments with other providers are pending. What we are wondering is that Viebrockhaus covers the walls with drywall instead of plaster. The advantage is, of course, Q3 quality. The disadvantage would be poorer support for TVs, etc., and susceptibility to dents.

We are unsure whether the concept is good or not. What do you think?

Thanks for feedback :)
Regards
Pascal

Sure that you understood that correctly? That is much more complicated and expensive than plaster and is rather done in old building renovation. It must be plastered beforehand anyway because otherwise the [mw] will not be airtight.

It wouldn't be mine. You already mentioned disadvantages. Additionally, there is comparatively high puttying effort. Well, it dries quickly in the house, gypsum plaster contains a lot of water. [Gioskarton null Wasser]. That saves construction time. But still, I find traditional plaster better. K.

Thanks for the thread. I often ask myself why people build solidly and then put cardboard walls inside.

I often ask myself why people build solid structures and then install cardboard walls inside.

Drywall partitions and gypsum board as a plaster substitute are two entirely different things. The former also makes sense in solid construction, as it is usually not more expensive and offers better results in almost every respect.

I would have concerns about airtightness, like . On the other hand, I don't see any problems with hanging a TV and so on; it would ultimately be anchored into the wall behind, just as with the variant using regular plaster.

So they would probably be fully glued. Thickness would be about 1.2cm, so actually nothing. The upper floor would be completely drywall.. I guess you have to like it or not ...