Disagreements regarding construction financing

  • Erstellt am 2015-12-14 21:56:57

Musketier

2015-12-15 13:16:31
  • #1


The financial advisor is surely also referred directly from the house sale, right?

As a rule, 10/15/20 years are standard products. The 12-year one would therefore be the additional product, but this is definitely not subsidized. In my opinion, serious advice looks different. Do yourselves a favor and take an independent financial broker.

You ultimately pay for the "subsidy" through the house price itself. So there is still room for negotiation downwards if you do not take advantage of the subsidized loan.
 

Inotsara

2015-12-15 13:22:43
  • #2
No, sorry, the 12 years are standard from the bank, the 10 years are the subsidized ones from the house provider. And yes, the financial advisor is a "free" advisor with whom our house advisor has worked for years. But I don’t want to imply anything. I’m really just trying to find out how much risk I’m taking if I wait with the application until April. Why does the advisor want to close the deal at all costs this year?
 

elVincent

2015-12-15 13:23:43
  • #3


If in doubt, you just have to keep bothering people until all questions are answered to your satisfaction and you know exactly what you are signing in the end. I think it is right and important to be cautious with the biggest investment of your life and question everything. If there is no detailed information on any topics, the provider is not reputable.
 

oleda222

2015-12-15 13:46:50
  • #4
Find banks/agents yourself who offer you the financing. Talk to your house bank, etc.
You should separate the financing from the house builder as much as possible to avoid conflicts of interest.
The interest surcharge of more than 0.5% for two additional years is outrageous.
You should deal with the topic of financing in great detail before signing the contract and obtaining credit insurance! There are numerous threads in this forum alone that can help, and I would also buy additional literature, e.g. from Finanztest, on the topic. Afterwards, you can better decide what suits you best.
 

Jochen104

2015-12-15 14:58:56
  • #5

What advantage does the advisor promise you from taking the 50,000 EUR via the KfW124 program instead of 50,000 EUR more through the bank loan? By the way, this applies to both options.
 

toxicmolotof

2015-12-15 15:51:33
  • #6
Wtf? Do you want to fit into the bank's scheme or should the bank adapt its offer to you?

Which bank has a 12-year fixed interest period as a standard? That is not a standard. Nowhere! And it has nothing to do with collateral either.

Why do you like this bank so much? That is certainly not a very good condition, even with 100% financing.
 

Similar topics
23.03.2009Does the capital provide financing10
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
25.07.2013Is financing possible?10
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
15.08.2012Build a house or buy one - financing possible?22
22.10.2012Single-family home financing - thoughtful after first bank discussion17
04.02.2013House planning completed - Is financing realistic?19
18.01.2013Is building a house possible with our savings and financing?19
04.02.2013Bank loan and loan-to-value - is financing affordable?11
20.02.2013We are not making progress in financing33
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
02.07.2013Residential Riester for Home Purchase Financing - Who Has Experience?16
10.07.2013What do you think about the financing? + I have a huge problem12
23.08.2013Financing existing property - Attention beginners ;-)13
02.09.2013House purchase, requesting opinions on financing10
19.11.2014Financing single-family house - How much can we afford?47
14.11.2013Is financing for construction projects feasible?10
22.04.2014Appointment at a well-known bank and problems with financing17
14.05.2014Is the financing so realistic? What is the amount of the financing?13

Oben