Daily savings accounts - How should one save best?

  • Erstellt am 2015-10-23 08:24:51

souly75

2015-10-24 10:15:26
  • #1
oh man....healthy half-knowledge who created your entry? cortal???
 

toxicmolotof

2015-10-24 10:57:56
  • #2
I like to repeat myself. Accounts that are exclusively passive (savings accounts, overnight money, fixed deposits, savings contracts, savings bonds) do not lead to Schufa entries.

It is different with contracts that can lead to a debtor-creditor relationship for the investor (overdraft, securities accounts, credit cards, etc...).

Therefore, I take the bet and say: pure savings accounts do not lead to changes in the Schufa score. Neither positive nor negative.

Bet: An ice cream or beer at the next meeting.
 

karni186

2015-10-25 06:11:08
  • #3


Schufa score has no impact on a secured loan? Wouldn't that mean that people who aim for 100% or more financing when building a house would get the construction loan despite a bad Schufa score? The collateral is usually the house here. I somehow can't imagine that.
 

lastdrop

2015-10-25 07:47:46
  • #4
The Schufa score should not influence the interest margin, but rather whether someone gets a loan at all.

A poor Schufa score is likely to be associated in the majority of cases with legitimately poorer creditworthiness (low income, other debts), which makes it difficult to distinguish whether a loan would be rejected due to a poor Schufa score or low creditworthiness.

However, even with a secured loan, the ability to service the debt (interest and repayment) must be ensured by an adequate income, which is not reflected in the Schufa score ...
 

toxicmolotof

2015-10-25 11:07:33
  • #5
A 100% financing is not a secure financing. In this respect, it is indeed a wrong assumption.

Technically correct is that a 60% financing is a secure financing without (or only with a low) realization risk.

In that case, one can quite simply ignore a bad score if the rest of the framework fits.
 

roadrun87

2015-10-26 12:33:07
  • #6
Quickly back to the topic of [Bausparer].
Do you think it might make sense to terminate existing [Bausparer] in advance (already now) and also save that via [Tagesgeld]?
Do I have any disadvantages if I keep the [Bausparer] running?

As mentioned, the interest can be neglected for the next 3 years since there are only about €15,000 in the [Bausparer].

I actually want to do less now for a later financing after the first fixed interest period expires, and rather save to keep the loan amount smaller.

I can also write out the details of my two [Bausparer] later.
 

Similar topics
25.07.2013Is financing possible?10
19.11.2014Financing single-family house - How much can we afford?47
30.06.2014Is financing a second property possible?14
25.12.2014Do we have enough money to finance the house?45
13.08.2015Building a house - from financing to planning12
10.07.2018House financing through SAB49
20.06.2016Error in financing?280
20.06.2016Experiences with income from self-employed individuals in financing?12
08.07.2016Follow-up financing rejected due to negative Schufa entry28
08.08.2016Financing of construction projects45
17.04.2017Is land and house construction possible with our income?43
22.04.2019Real estate loan with high collateral but low ongoing income35
16.08.2019What loan amount is realistic for house construction?190
21.10.2019Financing with building savings loan + KfW + subordinated loan17
24.10.2019Financing condominium despite bad Schufa score14
11.07.2020Is financing feasible? Stuttgart's Speckgürtel43
05.01.2021Renovation of an apartment in the parental home - loan, without being the owner?11
02.03.2021Financing a single-family house with 170 sqm30
14.04.2021New construction with single-family multi-generation house - financing realistic?17
21.02.2022Desired financing possible despite Federal Financial Supervisory Authority hammer, 0 KfW funding, etc.?20

Oben