Thank you very much for the numerous responses so far. I will try to address the points mentioned below.
Hello,
does that mean 400k (190k for the house and currently 210k for the land including all incidental costs, which is not enough?)
Our concrete fixed offer including incidental costs with real land was 450k total. How much will actually be added, I cannot really predict in advance.
52k pA gross or net? with net it would be 4333 per month with 400k financing, yes rather more.
You have to decide for yourselves whether to throw yourselves into the project. For the bank it will be feasible
Net and increasing. Why throw ourselves, is the volume beyond our means?
With 4300€ net in my opinion you should not finance higher. Rather then reduce the house standard or the plot size. And try to get a plot from the municipality so that you only pay incidental purchase costs on the land.
Unfortunately, nothing is available from the municipality.
The house is basically standard equipment with few extras. Due to the city’s requirements, almost all plots are 600+ sqm.
I explicitly emphasize not knowing the construction prices in the north, but a house for 190k is maximally possible in a cheap standard. That is not bad but you should be aware of it.
And the calculation would then be at least 190k house + 210k land + incidental costs for construction and land purchase.
So it already approaches 450,000 EUR I would say. Your equity is practically zero, because the 30,000 EUR will probably go towards kitchen, furnishings and other smaller expenses.
Don’t forget outdoor facilities either!
I agree. However, we hardly need any furnishings because it is fully equipped.
Only the kitchen, painting and flooring work will be done on our own.
Outdoor facilities will be left aside for now or created by ourselves.
The construction costs are very, very low. What is supposed to be included, how big? Incidental building costs, outdoor facilities, parking space?
Also, you don’t repay 400k with 1400€ per month in 30 years. You probably ignored the interest.
For example, at 2.3% interest, 30 years fixed (which is very optimistic because equity is near 0, realistically it would be rather 2.8% and more), 70,000€ residual debt remains with a 1400€ rate.
You can choose shorter terms but even with 20 years fixed interest 1400€ is just barely at the 2% minimum repayment rate expected nowadays (and does not lead to being debt-free after 30 years).
In my opinion, therefore, two factors are still not correct. On one hand the house price, which I consider unrealistically low. On the other hand the assumption of how much credit one gets for the targeted rate with virtually zero equity.
As a guideline, we calculate with 1500 EUR. Additional repayments are also to be made from savings.
What alternative calculation do you suggest regarding the rate or total volume?