Construction obligation by bank or municipality? Land purchase contract

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-27 20:51:46

BeckIsBack

2018-01-27 20:51:46
  • #1
Good evening,

as mentioned above, the question relates to the building obligation. In our sample purchase contract for the property, it is stated that we commit to building a ready-to-move-in single-family house within 18 months from the start of construction readiness. We find the timeframe quite ambitious. We also wonder whether the bank marketing the property can even include such a clause in the contract or whether this clause has any relevance at all – § 176 of the Building Code specifically names the municipality.

Does anyone have experience with this? Should I contact the municipality regarding this?

Thank you very much for your help!
 

Nordlys

2018-01-27 21:10:56
  • #2
The municipality will have determined this during the preparation of the development plan to prevent speculation. The selling bank will simply have to implement this and will have no choice. Karsten
 

toxicmolotof

2018-01-27 21:11:10
  • #3
Why should the bank require this clause? Does only the bank take over the marketing or is it the owner?

Usually, such clauses go back to the municipality and are based on the fact that one does not want speculators and buyers in such a development area who purchase plots as an investment or stockpile for later.

If one is not finished within the 18 months, but it can be seen that the house construction is progressing, no one will probably complain if it then takes 6 months longer (for whatever reasons).

A bank or a private seller have no interest in such clauses, but I do not know to what extent the municipality can intervene with private sellers.
 

BeckIsBack

2018-01-27 21:21:12
  • #4


In our case, the bank is the owner and also markets the plots accordingly. The bank also argues exactly as you say... that they have no interest in speculators. Nevertheless, we are dissatisfied with the 18 months, since in the current times it is quite possible that a trade might take a bit longer due to a "fully booked schedule".

Is it even legally possible to include such a clause in the contract, although the Building Code itself only refers to the municipality?

Many thanks for the quick responses!
 

Alex85

2018-01-27 21:45:13
  • #5
Just don't be too pedantic. Practically, it is irrelevant unless you plan to start construction only in years. They also want to complete the final road construction quickly in new development areas, etc.
 

ypg

2018-01-27 22:04:50
  • #6
It depends on the exact wording.

In general, a house construction start is limited in time. In your case, the clause is probably somewhere in the middle?
What is the correct wording?
 

Similar topics
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
13.09.2012Feeling pressured into a contract, is that normal?17
29.09.2011Is construction pre-planning without signature / contract legally valid?12
22.09.2012Who else fell for a contract with a reservation clause? - Search13
16.05.2015Contract unclear: humus earth collectors10
23.08.2015Construction financing with a fixed-term contract13
04.07.2016Building without a contract - Concerns?39
02.12.2016Plots in Cologne only through developers?54
06.06.2017Local bank markets plots - linked deal26
04.11.2017Work contract with general contractor - questions about the offer37
07.11.2019Experience finding plots by asking neighbors10
14.04.2020Security deposit according to §650 of the Building Code20
11.11.2020Cancellation of a contract with a plumbing company24
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
10.04.2021Delays with the general contractor, no deadline set according to § 650 Building Code65
05.08.2021Divide and develop plots themselves24
12.01.2022Union of two plots - redefine the building envelope?20
16.05.2022Which plots are the best in this building area (with plan)?17
05.09.2023Application for a new development area: Selection of plots41

Oben