Pianist
2020-04-08 12:26:28
- #1
Good day!
The ongoing drought is once again bringing up a topic for me that I have postponed several times: Where to get the water for garden irrigation? So far, it comes from the public network: always available, always enough pressure, and thanks to separate metering, also reasonably inexpensive. But actually, it can't be sensible to let high-quality drinking water seep away in the garden.
Is there a rule of thumb as to which form of garden irrigation is best from a financial and ecological perspective? Basically, there are three options to choose from: water from the public network, collecting rainwater from roof surfaces in cisterns, or drilling a well (if permitted).
For the use of rainwater to pay off, you would have to be able to store a lot of it, at least 20 to 30 cubic meters, to be able to bridge dry periods. Accordingly, the costs for cisterns and the associated earthworks would be high. And then the ongoing costs such as electricity and maintenance for the pump. Drilling a well also, of course, causes costs, plus electricity and maintenance for the pump. The advantage of the well: you don’t have to worry about storage capacity.
My garden irrigation (drip hoses under the mulch) consists of four circuits, each of which requires one cubic meter per hour. In case of persistent dryness, I would like to run each circuit for an hour every two to three days. That would be about ten cubic meters per week. With 30 cubic meters, you would therefore only get about three weeks. And in Berlin, we more and more often have situations where it doesn’t rain for significantly longer than three weeks.
Has anyone of you ever gone through this in detail?
Matthias
The ongoing drought is once again bringing up a topic for me that I have postponed several times: Where to get the water for garden irrigation? So far, it comes from the public network: always available, always enough pressure, and thanks to separate metering, also reasonably inexpensive. But actually, it can't be sensible to let high-quality drinking water seep away in the garden.
Is there a rule of thumb as to which form of garden irrigation is best from a financial and ecological perspective? Basically, there are three options to choose from: water from the public network, collecting rainwater from roof surfaces in cisterns, or drilling a well (if permitted).
For the use of rainwater to pay off, you would have to be able to store a lot of it, at least 20 to 30 cubic meters, to be able to bridge dry periods. Accordingly, the costs for cisterns and the associated earthworks would be high. And then the ongoing costs such as electricity and maintenance for the pump. Drilling a well also, of course, causes costs, plus electricity and maintenance for the pump. The advantage of the well: you don’t have to worry about storage capacity.
My garden irrigation (drip hoses under the mulch) consists of four circuits, each of which requires one cubic meter per hour. In case of persistent dryness, I would like to run each circuit for an hour every two to three days. That would be about ten cubic meters per week. With 30 cubic meters, you would therefore only get about three weeks. And in Berlin, we more and more often have situations where it doesn’t rain for significantly longer than three weeks.
Has anyone of you ever gone through this in detail?
Matthias