Building permit with an excavation permit

  • Erstellt am 2020-08-07 10:46:42

Bob1983

2020-08-10 10:21:47
  • #1
Hello Grillhendl, I wanted to know how I should/must handle this, is the construction supervision related to the house, or all earthworks? Before building, I wanted to build a 23-meter- long angled retaining wall 3 meters to the left of the house at a boundary. Do I already have to hire an archaeologist for that?
 

Grillhendl

2020-08-10 10:39:08
  • #2
Hello

It depends on how it is formulated in your building permit.

The house construction itself is irrelevant for the archaeologist. It is purely about the soil, i.e. the earthworks.

The archaeologist stands next to the excavator during the topsoil removal and watches to see if any findings emerge. It is already clear whether "digging" is necessary or not. If the topsoil removal is inconspicuous on ALL relevant (!) areas (including the wall), they fill out a form (which you and the monument authority receive) and then you can start building and will probably never be bothered again.

If findings come to light, it depends on the construction depth:

1. construction depth was reached: covering with geotextile basically suffices....(consultation with the monument office - but this is done by the archaeologist)

2. construction depth was not reached: excavation until reaching the construction depth, possibly a complete excavation, depending on the find/situation...

I don't know which state you live in. In Bavaria, different companies can be commissioned for the topsoil removal and the actual excavation:
the topsoil removal is one measure and the excavation itself is another measure. Therefore, they can be awarded differently....(but it doesn't really make sense)
 

Bob1983

2020-08-10 17:08:34
  • #3

Hello Grillhendl,

Am I even obligated to carry this out?
Or is this just a recommendation?
 

Grillhendl

2020-08-10 17:59:42
  • #4
Of course you are obliged... otherwise it wouldn't be in the building permit. and if you can't present the "paper" from the archaeologist, things look a bit grim.
 

Steven

2020-08-10 19:48:55
  • #5


Hello Bob1983

Does it say "are to be" or "must be"?
If it says "are to be," you can disregard it.
In official language, "are to be" means something like: you can do it if you want.

Steven
 

T_im_Norden

2020-08-10 19:54:51
  • #6
I rather don't believe that.

The modal verb sollen expresses a necessity.
 

Similar topics
09.06.2013Costs of earthworks without basement15
22.08.2013Are the estimated costs of the general contractor for earthworks reasonable?12
07.03.2014Earthworks are starting, but I need a tip.12
26.04.2016Sand, gravel, and other earthworks32
28.09.2016Evaluation of earthworks offer14
28.08.2017Earthworks: Making the right choice of provider14
29.12.2017Is it possible to found a single-family house without concrete and earthworks?21
25.01.2018Earthworks and shell construction, who bears the warranties?10
29.10.2018Earthworks in the construction performance description17
08.04.2019Earthworks costs in Bavaria15
14.06.2019Costs for earthworks18
08.09.2020Earthworks costs, hillside house14
23.07.2021Earthworks... Dispute with the occupational disability insurance20
17.11.2021Official liability building permit neighbor - keywords sought14
27.11.2021Ancillary construction costs for earthworks according to soil report16
15.03.2022Cost planning for earthworks33
29.04.2022Designing hillside property - Earthworks / Retaining wall cost options26
10.05.2022Carry out earthworks with equity capital?10
07.02.2025Cost issue for earthworks on a slope22

Oben