Brandenburg: Gallery level/attic floor

  • Erstellt am 2024-10-17 23:56:25

11ant

2024-10-19 21:11:21
  • #1
The Building Code of Brandenburg does recognize full storeys and non-full storeys in terms of substance, but does not distinguish them linguistically. There are also people who take issue with the term Unkosten, which is basically "the same thing in green." Nonetheless, it makes no sense whatsoever to confuse the average height above ground level of an underground storey with the standing height of an upper storey (which per se are not underground). It is apparently currently fashionable to misinterpret building regulations.
 

hanghaus2023

2024-10-20 08:50:28
  • #2
What does the development plan say about roof extensions?
 

tempusfugit

2024-10-21 04:24:05
  • #3
Unfortunately, the development plan is silent on this.

I have now varied the roof geometry a little and hope that this variant with an approximately 2.80-meter-wide flat element will also be approved:



This would result in a height of 2.6 to 2 meters at least over half the width at the top.



If it works out with a horizontal element similar to a mansard flat roof, we would already be very satisfied. Around the new development area, there are houses that represent everything the 90s and 2000s had to offer in trends: staggered shed roofs, butterfly roofs, barrel roofs, etc. Obviously, all higher than 6m. But prior to the citizen participation for the development area, there were massive objections from these homeowners, and therefore it has now been regulated quite strictly.
 

kbt09

2024-10-21 07:42:44
  • #4
575 cm ridge height will never result in 2 stories each with 260 cm usable room height. You must not forget floor, ceiling, and roof construction and the 575 cm ridge height is measured from the outside.
 

hanghaus2023

2024-10-21 11:10:08
  • #5
Is the plot flat? How big should the house be? In my opinion, it's going towards 14m * 12m.

You are already 7 m high, right?

You should have something like that done by an architect. Preferably one who is familiar with the local building authority.

A flat roof is not at least 20 degrees inclined.

I repeat my inquiry from post #5
 

Schorsch_baut

2024-10-21 11:25:48
  • #6
Is such a roof technically feasible and sensible at all? And why these contortions, when more space is allowed? Why does it have to be a "gallery"?
 

Similar topics
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
14.04.2015Uneconomic development plan31
04.05.2015How long is a development plan valid?20
21.12.2017Development plan - 1.5-story building?16
16.02.2016Regulations regarding development plans, any experiences?22
13.06.2016Build an investment property, despite a 1 1/2-story development plan11
14.11.2016Horse chestnut in the development plan13
21.02.2017Development plan difference between ground floor, roof, and single-storey17
20.04.2017Development plan for a multi-family house16
05.10.2017Property / Development Plan / Retaining Walls / Excavations17
28.02.2018Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible118
18.01.2019Development plan: Garage on the boundary outside the building window53
09.07.2018Demolition of existing house - new construction: what does the development plan allow?11
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
15.04.2019Opinions on floor plan design (Iso views, floor plans, development plan)43
27.09.2018Development plan roof shapes / distance - What is allowed?12
07.10.2018Development plan deviations - the neighbors do not want to agree15
18.04.2019Development plan of 1998 - Setting the eaves height to a maximum of 3.00m12
03.02.2020Restrictive development plan - is buying land worth it?20
10.05.2025Floor plan of a single-family house measuring 14x14 meters with limited ridge height35

Oben