86bibo
2018-02-28 13:42:09
- #1
Hello everyone,
we have a bathroom on the upper floor, which still dates back to 1988, and what bothers us most is the current shower. It has external dimensions of 80x80cm and a high entry of almost 40cm. In addition, there is a three-part sliding door inside, which makes the entrance very narrow. So all in all, very inconvenient and no longer state of the art. On the ground floor, we already have a renovated shower bathroom, but it’s not ideal as the main shower, since all our bedrooms are on the upper floor and you have to go upstairs through the open living hall to get dressed again.
Unfortunately, the builder deviated from the original plan back then and made the bathroom only 2.10m wide instead of 3m. The room is 3.17m long and 2m wide (including the pre-wall installation at the washbasin and toilet). Accordingly, a fairly classic design for that time emerged, with a bathtub and shower on one side and toilet and washbasin opposite. Of course, we could roughly keep the layout and only extend the shower, since there is still a shelf of almost 50cm behind the bathtub. This would give us a shower size of 80x130cm. However, the entrance area in the bathroom is currently extremely narrow, so two people are basically not possible. Also, we really don’t like the rather old-fashioned layout. Unfortunately, there aren’t many options. Next to the bathroom, however, is a relatively large room (4.5x4.2m²), which is currently not used at all and will later become a guest room or office.
Our idea is to steal a few square meters from the neighboring room and "outsource" the shower there. We thought of a 1x1.4m or 1x1.6m shower tray (if there is such a shower tray). The toilet would roughly stay in place, which shouldn’t be a problem since the drain pipe runs at the bottom left of the room. We would move the washbasin to the opposite side, where connections are basically present because the bathtub and shower are currently there. We would like to place the bathtub crosswise in front of the windows. I am aware that this makes the window opening more difficult, but for one thing, we can’t think of a better layout, we like the bathtub’s placement this way, and we are considering installing decentralized ventilation in the bathroom so that it doesn’t have to be aired out so often. Supplying water there is no problem; whether the drain height will work, we still have to check. However, since the screed will probably be renewed anyway because of underfloor heating, this should also be possible. The main problem is probably the shower. Of course, a new lintel must be installed in the wall opening, and I need to see how flat the drain can be designed. A step into the shower would not be a no-go for us either. The entrance door would have its hinge reversed so that when the door is open it only blocks the entrance to the shower. However, since one doesn’t shower with the bathroom door open, this wouldn’t actually be a disadvantage.
My question: What do you think about the plan and layout?
Does anyone have a better idea for implementing it?
What else must be considered?


we have a bathroom on the upper floor, which still dates back to 1988, and what bothers us most is the current shower. It has external dimensions of 80x80cm and a high entry of almost 40cm. In addition, there is a three-part sliding door inside, which makes the entrance very narrow. So all in all, very inconvenient and no longer state of the art. On the ground floor, we already have a renovated shower bathroom, but it’s not ideal as the main shower, since all our bedrooms are on the upper floor and you have to go upstairs through the open living hall to get dressed again.
Unfortunately, the builder deviated from the original plan back then and made the bathroom only 2.10m wide instead of 3m. The room is 3.17m long and 2m wide (including the pre-wall installation at the washbasin and toilet). Accordingly, a fairly classic design for that time emerged, with a bathtub and shower on one side and toilet and washbasin opposite. Of course, we could roughly keep the layout and only extend the shower, since there is still a shelf of almost 50cm behind the bathtub. This would give us a shower size of 80x130cm. However, the entrance area in the bathroom is currently extremely narrow, so two people are basically not possible. Also, we really don’t like the rather old-fashioned layout. Unfortunately, there aren’t many options. Next to the bathroom, however, is a relatively large room (4.5x4.2m²), which is currently not used at all and will later become a guest room or office.
Our idea is to steal a few square meters from the neighboring room and "outsource" the shower there. We thought of a 1x1.4m or 1x1.6m shower tray (if there is such a shower tray). The toilet would roughly stay in place, which shouldn’t be a problem since the drain pipe runs at the bottom left of the room. We would move the washbasin to the opposite side, where connections are basically present because the bathtub and shower are currently there. We would like to place the bathtub crosswise in front of the windows. I am aware that this makes the window opening more difficult, but for one thing, we can’t think of a better layout, we like the bathtub’s placement this way, and we are considering installing decentralized ventilation in the bathroom so that it doesn’t have to be aired out so often. Supplying water there is no problem; whether the drain height will work, we still have to check. However, since the screed will probably be renewed anyway because of underfloor heating, this should also be possible. The main problem is probably the shower. Of course, a new lintel must be installed in the wall opening, and I need to see how flat the drain can be designed. A step into the shower would not be a no-go for us either. The entrance door would have its hinge reversed so that when the door is open it only blocks the entrance to the shower. However, since one doesn’t shower with the bathroom door open, this wouldn’t actually be a disadvantage.
My question: What do you think about the plan and layout?
Does anyone have a better idea for implementing it?
What else must be considered?