Assignment of claims - Do all banks do this? Can it be changed?

  • Erstellt am 2017-04-11 13:06:42

toxicmolotof

2017-04-11 17:15:56
  • #1
There are so many words misused in the text that I do not want to go into them individually. Let's put it this way... poorly formulated. And especially: What year are we talking about in the said case?
 

Nordlys

2017-04-11 17:58:54
  • #2
I don't know.
 

toxicmolotof

2017-04-11 18:47:21
  • #3
Exactly, since then laws have also changed. and in this context I would like to point out Baugesetzbuch 1192.
 

Nordlys

2017-04-11 19:02:33
  • #4
Ok. I'll have a look. Apparently, you are a banker and consider passing on loans to third parties harmless? Karsten
 

toxicmolotof

2017-04-11 19:24:27
  • #5
Yes, I also once completed an apprenticeship as a bank clerk and I am a proponent of contracts being honored. And that means from the first to the last day. For all parties involved. One-sided advantage-taking I find outrageous.

Covered mortgage bonds as refinancing instruments I find absolutely harmless and they have existed longer than the generation of bank clerks who retired last month.

Furthermore, I consider the transfer within the [SFG] or [VRB] absolutely harmless, regardless of whether this serves refinancing or risk diversification.
 

Nordlys

2017-04-11 19:38:39
  • #6
Covered bonds, yes I know those too, of course. But what Wiki says about [Kreditverbriefung] is something else, I only understand it halfway, and it’s uncanny to me and I don’t want to get involved with that. Karsten
 
Oben