Very rough single-family house price estimate

Okay, my question was only worth 4 characters to you.

What a pity.

Especially since the 1300 euros per m2 once came from you in a reader post, I believe.

No... I'm the guy for the financing ...

Especially because the 1300 euros per m2 once came from you in a reader's post, I believe.

If you read diligently, you should know that there is a north-south gradient and average differences whether the house is 90 or 200 sqm.

Otherwise, just calculate 1800€/sqm* ... in Brandenburg, building is supposed to still be super cheap.
*only for the house without floor coverings, normal equipment, average size, on a slab foundation.

If you read along diligently, you should know that there is a north-south divide and there are average differences depending on whether the house is 90 or 200 sqm.

Otherwise, just calculate 1800€/sqm* ... in Brandenburg building is supposed to be super cheap.
*only for the house without floor coverings, normal equipment, average size, on a slab.

Thank you for the constructive response.

Yes, it is about Brandenburg and it should be 130-170 m2, depending on what it is supposed to cost.

Milo, thank you for your answer. But I explicitly wrote, only the house, without the plot.
And the living area is exactly what we are currently undecided about. Sure, you discuss that with the construction company but I would like to have as much information as possible beforehand so that you can start planning right away. So if you know that 170m2 floor area is financially not feasible, then you can look right away for floor plans with e.g. 150m2.

But I already thought that it probably makes sense to discuss everything for 2 hours with an expert and then it takes a few days/weeks until an offer is prepared.

Thank you all

My question had a purpose: to find out whether it is a rather expensive area or a rather affordable area. But no offense. 170sqm does not necessarily mean proportionally more expensive than 130sqm.

My question had a purpose: to find out whether it is a rather expensive area or a rather affordable area. But no hard feelings. 170sqm does not necessarily mean proportionally more expensive than 130sqm.

Thank you, as mentioned.

It is currently a very, very big topic for us, but more like research on our own, so naturally still totally unrefined. You first have to read so much and think about it before you sacrifice your well-deserved weekends for the planning and then hopefully, finally, the dear money for the construction.

It was just an attempt to roughly outline the whole thing. Probably not very sensible :)

So if you know that 170m2 floor area is not financially feasible, you might as well look for floor plans with, for example, 150m2.

Really? – Do you build bigger than you need just to impress yourself with your creditworthiness in the form of extra square meters? – or the other way around: do you camp in the garden because without the space for the bedroom the installment is lower? Your furniture needs a certain amount of space, you need a certain amount of room to move between, and how efficiently you arrange this packing density significantly influences how many square meters result. More beautiful living is not proportional to bigger rooms. And what do you do if your budget allows not 170 and not 150, but 130 sqm? – put a potential desire for children on file and instead get a Miniature Pinscher because it stays small? *smile*