detowu
2017-07-23 22:00:29
- #1
Good evening everyone,
my wife and I finally found a suitable place to build last year after a long search.
The building plot is on a slope, or rather, the plot itself is relatively flat, but it is located on a kind of terrace. You can imagine it like a huge staircase and the house will be built on one of the steps.
We bought the property with the premise of having a specific house (adapted to our wishes) built by a certain construction company. So the company knew from the beginning what would be built where.
There was still a barn and an old residential building on the property. These buildings have now been demolished by 95%.
The first construction phase was labeled "completion of demolition."
Originally, we were told that a payment installment must be made only after the completion of a construction phase. So only what is really finished should be paid for. However, the small basement room of the house is still standing (the missing 5%) and yet we were already asked to pay the first installment.
Unfortunately, we did so immediately.
A soil survey was also recently carried out. Furthermore, the retaining wall that holds the property was examined more closely.
Now suddenly it is said that the construction company cannot guarantee that the wall will hold the house. They are advising us to build a new wall, which will cause very high unplanned costs.
Honestly, we feel a bit like we have been conned.
Shouldn’t such an inspection have been the very first thing to be done?
As laypersons, we builders cannot be expected to assess whether such a wall is sufficient or not. Who is to blame?
Under certain circumstances, the wall could cost as much again as the property (offer has not yet been received).
I look forward to your answers.
Kind regards,
Dennis + Anna
my wife and I finally found a suitable place to build last year after a long search.
The building plot is on a slope, or rather, the plot itself is relatively flat, but it is located on a kind of terrace. You can imagine it like a huge staircase and the house will be built on one of the steps.
We bought the property with the premise of having a specific house (adapted to our wishes) built by a certain construction company. So the company knew from the beginning what would be built where.
There was still a barn and an old residential building on the property. These buildings have now been demolished by 95%.
The first construction phase was labeled "completion of demolition."
Originally, we were told that a payment installment must be made only after the completion of a construction phase. So only what is really finished should be paid for. However, the small basement room of the house is still standing (the missing 5%) and yet we were already asked to pay the first installment.
Unfortunately, we did so immediately.
A soil survey was also recently carried out. Furthermore, the retaining wall that holds the property was examined more closely.
Now suddenly it is said that the construction company cannot guarantee that the wall will hold the house. They are advising us to build a new wall, which will cause very high unplanned costs.
Honestly, we feel a bit like we have been conned.
Shouldn’t such an inspection have been the very first thing to be done?
As laypersons, we builders cannot be expected to assess whether such a wall is sufficient or not. Who is to blame?
Under certain circumstances, the wall could cost as much again as the property (offer has not yet been received).
I look forward to your answers.
Kind regards,
Dennis + Anna