The architect and the client cannot agree on a design

  • Erstellt am 2018-11-27 17:34:45

11ant

2018-11-28 02:26:24
  • #1
Some of the outright failures to come together between builder and architect are also due to conditions that do not allow it. Or because the architect is a professional and recognizes where something does not work – even if the layperson thinks everything would fit in their shareware house design program.

In my mental cinema, I just see an architect being insulted for not being able to achieve the desired TV viewing distance in the bathroom of the semi-detached house ;-)

That the architect does not participate in "Bauhaus Toscana" for reasons of taste should be able to be clarified before serious design work begins.
 

Bookstar

2018-11-28 07:04:54
  • #2
I wouldn't overestimate this now. Something like this happens from time to time and you have to try to be willing to compromise. Give the architect a few thousand euros and come to an agreement. He has provided a service after all. If a new architect shows up, discuss beforehand whether he can build on it. Many will refuse that, and then the money would have been wasted for you.
 

Mottenhausen

2018-11-28 10:39:48
  • #3


>>Taste<< is formulated too generally here. What exactly does it depend on? I do not believe that the architect wants to enforce his "taste"; rather, I believe there are execution-related restrictions and dependencies.

What I am getting at: even your next architect will run into the same limits within the apparently narrowly defined requirement framework, and you will be back at the same point. But several thousand euros poorer.

Would you perhaps like to tell us more details: where lies the difference between the design in your head and the architect's design... which decisions do not suit your taste... where does the hamster start limping?
 

Pyrate

2018-12-06 18:22:44
  • #4
Just wanted to give you a quick update, we are continuing to work with the architect after all. He took our concerns very seriously once again and convinced us that he would work on it again. Yesterday we received the results and it is actually very good. If it still hadn't worked out for us, he had offered to outline how much work he had invested and then we would look for an amount that would have been acceptable to everyone. He said it was his goal to convince clients with his work and if he doesn't succeed, then he has failed somewhere. Overall, a happy ending.
 

ypg

2018-12-06 18:37:29
  • #5
How funny it is when you keep a question general or even talk about a friend, and then later switch to the first person form ;) Great that you were able to agree. Maybe you could show one or the other version of your design in a floor plan thread?!
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
20.08.2016Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?30
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17

Oben