If I assume that the stud frame is placed under the screed and not on the screed, then a drywall partition should already insulate sound very well, whether it is airborne or structure-borne sound.
I will ask which panels the architect planned to use, as in my opinion it only makes sense if the silent panels are used, which are, however, significantly more expensive.
If I assume that the stud frame is placed under the screed and not on the screed, then a drywall should provide very good sound insulation, regardless of whether it's airborne or structure-borne sound.
I will ask which panels the architect planned, as in my opinion it only makes sense if silent panels are used, which are, however, significantly more expensive.
You are an engineer after all - just have the associated octave spectrum presented for the sound insulation measurement, then you can see in which frequency range the strengths lie.
Drywall partitions can be both load-bearing and bracing.
We are not talking here about stud walls from which entire prefabricated houses can be made. Nor about walls for mounting sanitary installations. Rather, about the clad metal track constructions (which cannot support a roof or ceiling, and which are not counted as bracing in skeleton construction).
If I assume that the stud frame is placed under the screed and not on the screed, then a drywall partition should offer very good sound insulation, whether airborne or structure-borne sound.
That means it must be installed in the sequence before the screed is laid, and makes it less suitable for later removal or relocation. However, acoustically it is more favorable.
Then this approach by the planner singulär im OberGeschoss (?) surprises me
It does have one advantage, though: more freedom to position walls completely differently than on the floor below.
