Reallocation of parcels with multiple owners

I would also favor No. 1. The owners see it that way too. Do you have the first right of choice?

I actually meant less a verbal explanation of the still too small image section with supposedly recognizable red or black lines, but rather a functionally larger context illustrated.

red or black lines

[ATTACH alt="Teilungsplan.png" type="full"]58802[/ATTACH] a little image correction can also be done with paint.net.

larger context

[ATTACH alt="Luftbild_Flurstück.png" type="full"]58803[/ATTACH]

If I were one of these two, I would first "consolidate land" and swap 1055 and 1056 with each other (even without compensation for the 28 sqm).

Not necessary, it is residential building land secured by a rounding statute according to §34 Building Code.

but all too large for single-family houses

No, Hinterland development does not allow the statute.

In 1056 there is a high-voltage mast. How do the lines run there? They should meet 1054, right?

There is a high-voltage mast at 1056.

Oh, then there are restricted corridors.

Oh, there are then restricted corridors.

The mast itself is outside the divided properties. Unfortunately, you cannot see in the photo where the next one is.