Redsonic
2016-10-10 22:44:27
- #1
Hello everyone,
we are currently building a city villa and are also planning a fireplace. To consider everything during the execution planning, we are now dealing with the fireplace planning. In the house, between the living and dining room (41 m²), there is a corner where the Schiedel chimney will go and where the fireplace should stand.
The planned fireplace should:
- fit into our corner (1.00 x 1.27 m including chimney)
- allow an optical fire through a 2-sided glass
- thereby emit gentle radiant heat
- store the heat as long as possible; >= 6-10h (my parents have a hypocaust system)
- preferably have a modern look, a step design over two levels and an overhang for the chimney so that it looks visually integrated # link removed by moderation; building expert
Now two fireplace builders have offered us two completely different concepts. One wants to sell us a warm air stove with storage (e.g. fireplace insert from the company Spartherm Varia 1 V-4S with magnetic storage, possibly fireplace insert also with storage). The other offered us a fireplace with double-chamber storage technology without warm air balancing (e.g. Rüegg Venus). Both are priced equally at around 8,000 EUR plus.
What do you say? Which concept stores heat longer and has better quality? The stove builder with the warm air stove said that we can’t manage with a closed system within space and budget and that his also stores heat for a very long time. The colleague with the storage fireplace says that the warm air stove alone can only store heat for 3 hours structurally, even if packed with storage.
Thanks and best regards, Redsonic

we are currently building a city villa and are also planning a fireplace. To consider everything during the execution planning, we are now dealing with the fireplace planning. In the house, between the living and dining room (41 m²), there is a corner where the Schiedel chimney will go and where the fireplace should stand.
The planned fireplace should:
- fit into our corner (1.00 x 1.27 m including chimney)
- allow an optical fire through a 2-sided glass
- thereby emit gentle radiant heat
- store the heat as long as possible; >= 6-10h (my parents have a hypocaust system)
- preferably have a modern look, a step design over two levels and an overhang for the chimney so that it looks visually integrated # link removed by moderation; building expert
Now two fireplace builders have offered us two completely different concepts. One wants to sell us a warm air stove with storage (e.g. fireplace insert from the company Spartherm Varia 1 V-4S with magnetic storage, possibly fireplace insert also with storage). The other offered us a fireplace with double-chamber storage technology without warm air balancing (e.g. Rüegg Venus). Both are priced equally at around 8,000 EUR plus.
What do you say? Which concept stores heat longer and has better quality? The stove builder with the warm air stove said that we can’t manage with a closed system within space and budget and that his also stores heat for a very long time. The colleague with the storage fireplace says that the warm air stove alone can only store heat for 3 hours structurally, even if packed with storage.
Thanks and best regards, Redsonic