dumdidum!
2020-10-23 12:42:53
- #1
Hello,
we are about to hand over the house and now have a problem. Our painting company on the builder's side was supposed to putty and sand the entire house in Q3 and then apply painting fleece and paint white. Due to delays, we received the information that they are now entering a time window where no capacities are available anymore. We naturally panicked because every painting company laughs at you when you ask for short-term capacities.
So we accepted an offer from the builder that the painters at least putty and sand the house and that we would have to do the renovation ourselves if necessary.
Now we were lucky to still find a company that will wallpaper the house, but as we almost expected, there are problems if two companies do the painting work. This specifically concerns the concrete ceilings on the ground floor.
Company 1 had in the offer to putty and sand the ceilings, 70 sqm in Q3. In the end, only the joints between the panels were worked on, which we would have received in Q2 anyway according to the construction service description. Of course, 70 sqm are to be charged even though maybe 10-15 sqm were worked on. In my opinion, this is quite borderline.
Company 2, who are supposed to wallpaper the ceilings, now say that the ceilings are not in Q3 condition and that the interplay of concrete and putty could shine through the fleece. They will putty the entire surface in Q3.
I already know that if defects occur, one company will blame the other. Of course, that is our fault, but we were forced into this situation by the short-term failure of Company 1.
Are there any guidelines that specify how concrete ceilings are supposed to look in Q3? That is, fully puttied or only joints puttied?
we are about to hand over the house and now have a problem. Our painting company on the builder's side was supposed to putty and sand the entire house in Q3 and then apply painting fleece and paint white. Due to delays, we received the information that they are now entering a time window where no capacities are available anymore. We naturally panicked because every painting company laughs at you when you ask for short-term capacities.
So we accepted an offer from the builder that the painters at least putty and sand the house and that we would have to do the renovation ourselves if necessary.
Now we were lucky to still find a company that will wallpaper the house, but as we almost expected, there are problems if two companies do the painting work. This specifically concerns the concrete ceilings on the ground floor.
Company 1 had in the offer to putty and sand the ceilings, 70 sqm in Q3. In the end, only the joints between the panels were worked on, which we would have received in Q2 anyway according to the construction service description. Of course, 70 sqm are to be charged even though maybe 10-15 sqm were worked on. In my opinion, this is quite borderline.
Company 2, who are supposed to wallpaper the ceilings, now say that the ceilings are not in Q3 condition and that the interplay of concrete and putty could shine through the fleece. They will putty the entire surface in Q3.
I already know that if defects occur, one company will blame the other. Of course, that is our fault, but we were forced into this situation by the short-term failure of Company 1.
Are there any guidelines that specify how concrete ceilings are supposed to look in Q3? That is, fully puttied or only joints puttied?