Pipilotta
2013-05-04 11:36:46
- #1
Dear forum,
we have been dealing with the planning of a timber frame house for some time and had actually already decided on a provider (local, builds 40 houses a year, very good reputation) and just yesterday received an offer from a competitor. He is also from the region, builds 20 houses a year, many extensions and conversions and roof trusses etc.).
I have now compared the prices in the offers and came to a net price difference of 20,000. As far as I can see, the wall structure (including insulation) is the same, but the cheaper one uses gypsum fiber boards instead of plasterboard and would install a panel ceiling instead of a wooden beam ceiling, so rather more expensive materials are used. The roof trusses differ too, the more expensive one makes a double roof truss with exposed roof truss, the other a simple one without exposed roof truss. In addition, all architectural services are included in the more expensive one, while the other would draw the plan, but we tend to still consult an architect. Another difference is that the more expensive offer is turnkey, whereas the other only offers the house without technical installations.
Now we are totally uncertain because the more expensive one simply seems extremely competent (master carpenter of the guild, DIN committee, lecturer at a timber construction university of applied sciences etc.) and the other is "only" a "normal" carpenter and roofer, who can also explain all questions plausibly. The other point is that we have the feeling that there is a concept behind the houses of the more expensive one and the other just builds the house as we tell him. Hm... Do you understand my problem? Does anyone have a tip on how we can manage our decision?
Many thanks & best regards,
Pipi
we have been dealing with the planning of a timber frame house for some time and had actually already decided on a provider (local, builds 40 houses a year, very good reputation) and just yesterday received an offer from a competitor. He is also from the region, builds 20 houses a year, many extensions and conversions and roof trusses etc.).
I have now compared the prices in the offers and came to a net price difference of 20,000. As far as I can see, the wall structure (including insulation) is the same, but the cheaper one uses gypsum fiber boards instead of plasterboard and would install a panel ceiling instead of a wooden beam ceiling, so rather more expensive materials are used. The roof trusses differ too, the more expensive one makes a double roof truss with exposed roof truss, the other a simple one without exposed roof truss. In addition, all architectural services are included in the more expensive one, while the other would draw the plan, but we tend to still consult an architect. Another difference is that the more expensive offer is turnkey, whereas the other only offers the house without technical installations.
Now we are totally uncertain because the more expensive one simply seems extremely competent (master carpenter of the guild, DIN committee, lecturer at a timber construction university of applied sciences etc.) and the other is "only" a "normal" carpenter and roofer, who can also explain all questions plausibly. The other point is that we have the feeling that there is a concept behind the houses of the more expensive one and the other just builds the house as we tell him. Hm... Do you understand my problem? Does anyone have a tip on how we can manage our decision?
Many thanks & best regards,
Pipi