New single-family house construction without a basement - necessary tips and recommendations

  • Erstellt am 2019-06-11 11:58:05

franklin20

2019-06-11 11:58:05
  • #1
Hello everyone,

we want to build a single-family house and are slowly becoming very uncertain about what is necessary and what should best be implemented.

We want to build a single-family house without a basement, so the living area should be around 140m², as a study room is to be set up on the ground floor. We would like a brine-water geothermal heating system. Additionally, a ventilation system, cistern, and photovoltaic system for electricity.

But every provider says something different.

Therefore, my questions:

Prefab/solid house? Solid offers better sound insulation and a more valuable house.
Which heating? Geothermal? Air heat pump? Important here also, what about the electricity costs then? We want low additional costs.
Ventilation system necessary? Central/decentral? Is window ventilation sufficient?
Photovoltaic? Is it worthwhile? Probably only with storage?

If you have questions or need more information, just ask. If this belongs in another subforum, feel free to move it.

If there is already a topic with tips for new builds, please just link it and I will take a look.
 

Grobmutant

2019-06-11 13:14:19
  • #2
Hello,

these are pretty general questions that can probably often only be answered with "depends":


That probably depends more on the manufacturer whether it is valuable or not.


It is not necessary, rather a luxury/comfort. You can also ventilate only with windows if you manage to do this several times a day in all rooms. If we hopefully build soon, I would choose a central controlled residential ventilation because the comfort is worth the price to me.


Photovoltaics is generally worthwhile, but not with storage. The prices for storage are still too expensive at the moment, so it will never pay off. The prices for the modules are currently quite cheap, so the system usually pays off after 7 - 10 years. Of course, this depends on the purchase price and your solar exposure (roof orientation, roof pitch, shading, etc.)


Short answer:
Geothermal: Higher acquisition costs, but usually lower electricity costs.
Air heat pump: Lower acquisition costs, but may require electric heating at very low temperatures.
 

franklin20

2019-06-11 13:42:10
  • #3
Thank you for the answers.



What would this comfort be for you then? Not having to ventilate all the time and also saving energy/heating costs through heat recovery?




The orientation of the roof should be on the south side without major shading in our case. Does this then mean only using the currently produced electricity or otherwise feeding it into the grid and receiving a remuneration for it?
 

Niloa

2019-06-11 14:02:05
  • #4
I think that new build houses are now so airtight that some kind of ventilation must definitely be installed. You can’t keep up by just opening windows to ventilate. In new builds, a central controlled residential ventilation system is installed, decentralized systems are for retrofitting and I think have no advantages in new builds, rather disadvantages. I don’t want to live without controlled residential ventilation anymore. You always have fresh air, which thanks to filters is also pollen-free. Strong cooking odors disappear overnight. Humidity can also be better regulated. In addition, you can save energy through a heat exchanger (is that what it’s called, I’m not sure right now). Regarding the heating source: it depends on many factors, e.g. whether geothermal energy is allowed or space is available, what heating load the house needs, and so on...
 

11ant

2019-06-11 14:22:42
  • #5
First, get a plot of land. Second, then you have a specific location around which you can look for a builder; and first, the plot or the applicable development plan for it significantly influences the shape the house can have.

Then build what the builder has experience with, that minimizes execution errors. This applies not only to the building material he is most familiar with, but also when it comes to heating and climate issues, you should not let him venture into new territory. So make your choice only between options he is "experienced with."

Brick by brick does not objectively have to be necessary - but subjectively it does, if your banker has a cardboard-box shack image in mind regarding "prefabricated houses."
 

Grobmutant

2019-06-11 14:38:36
  • #6

Exactly. Above all, feeding into the grid currently brings the profit. Self-consumption is then the additional bonus. A high self-consumption would be optimal, but not always feasible, as most people are not at home during the day when the sun is shining and thus cannot consume the produced electricity.
 

Similar topics
02.09.2013Which heating system for prefab houses: air source heat pump, geothermal, solar, photovoltaic17
28.05.2018Air-water heat pump or gas + controlled residential ventilation in a 135 sqm single-family house?19
03.03.2021Purchase single-family house new build energy saving regulation standard prospectively sufficient?24
07.11.2021Newly built single-family house - gas or air heat pump + photovoltaics + storage?169
20.01.2022New single-family house 140 - Is it financially feasible like this?58
01.02.2022Which heating system and how to combine it with photovoltaic / solar thermal?18
17.02.2023Procedure for constructing a new single-family house on an existing plot179
18.07.2024New building with granny flat: Photovoltaic - Electricity - Heating16
27.09.2024PV system offer including storage - Storage yes/no?44
06.01.2025Is the photovoltaic price okay? 10.2 kWp and 5 kWh storage14

Oben