Everyone sees it a little differently. Whether you can build, meaning whether the financial means are sufficient, is told to you by your account, your salary, your bank, and the land prices as well as house prices. All of this should be well calculated. If the numbers add up, you can build independently. An architect or architect-designed house can achieve quite a bit more cheaply if you want a house in the higher price range. That’s where the architect scores points. If you want planning security without much fuss and exoticism, then in my opinion the general contractor still scores points.
And you think that a construction company (often working with many subs) doesn’t have the same problems? They all just cook with water.
He doesn’t say that at all. He never mentioned a construction company. For many who are dealing with house building for the first time, they don’t even know the term general contractor or construction companies that work with subs.
Actually, an architect should have good contacts with construction companies.
They do. But that doesn’t make building a house cheaper, rather it reduces construction errors and defects.
But as I said, they all just cook with water.
because vitamin B is water-soluble
and no one can offer friendship prices.
Yep.
Strong delays should more or less be avoided through good planning.
I’ll put it this way: an architect-designed house takes _on average_ longer than a turnkey house from a GC (regardless of Corona and material backlog, this has always been the case) and can easily be 20% over budget, precisely because prices change, you pay rent longer, and enter the readiness interest payment. But you also get more quality at more transparent prices.