CarinaJ
2017-06-07 18:03:37
- #1
I am very sure that I am not misreading the development plan. I will copy the symbols here later. Development with DH is possible but not mandatory.
I find 17m very tight, because
- width for the double garage 7m
- boundary distance on at least one side min. 3m
- boundary development with a single garage on each side is not possible.
= 17-7-3
=7m house width.
I am rather planning with 9.5 - 12.5 house width.
For us, the double garage is a KO criterion. Cars are protected, no scraping in winter, no fogged windows, dry feet into the house, no maneuvering and no parking search.
I find 17m very tight, because
- width for the double garage 7m
- boundary distance on at least one side min. 3m
- boundary development with a single garage on each side is not possible.
= 17-7-3
=7m house width.
I am rather planning with 9.5 - 12.5 house width.
For us, the double garage is a KO criterion. Cars are protected, no scraping in winter, no fogged windows, dry feet into the house, no maneuvering and no parking search.