Limit the photovoltaic system to 70% and install a wireless remote control receiver

  • Erstellt am 2014-10-07 13:13:29

Doc.Schnaggls

2014-10-07 13:13:29
  • #1
Hello,

our photovoltaic system is supposed to be installed on our roof, which will hopefully be ready, at the same time as the house construction in about 2 weeks.

We are currently a bit unsure about what makes more sense:

1. To "limit" the system to 70% of the maximum capacity or

2. To install a radio ripple control receiver so that the electricity provider can remotely control the system.

How and why did you handle this with your photovoltaic systems?

We have an almost perfect south orientation without shading and our system will provide a maximum output of 4.25 kWp.

Is it true that the electricity provider, if they shut down the system at some point, still has to pay compensation (in the form of a reimbursement)?

Best regards,

Dirk
 

Wastl

2014-10-07 13:37:50
  • #2
Hello Dirk, I have number 2. Disadvantage: It costs an extra 400€ again,.... My system has never been shut down so far (2 years of operation). Why? About 1 km away there is a solar park that is shut down first in case of overproduction. Yes, they pay compensation (but you are obliged to find out yourself when they shut down your system). You have to check a website every few months and see if you were affected. The throttling is permanent - from when do the extra 400€ payment pay off? You have to calculate that yourself.
 

Doc.Schnaggls

2014-10-07 14:16:22
  • #3
Hello Wastl,

Thank you for your reply. I am currently also leaning more towards solution 2 - the receiver costs us EUR 249.00 including calibration + VAT, so just under EUR 300.00.

Did you get this website from the electricity provider, or from somewhere else?

Best regards,

Dirk
 

Wastl

2014-10-07 14:31:32
  • #4

Yes. The website was given to me by letter from Bayernwerk. They are responsible for the power grid in our area and at the same time my customers.
 

Doc.Schnaggls

2014-10-07 14:40:47
  • #5
: Thank you!
 

nordanney

2014-10-07 15:32:46
  • #6
We chose the 70% regulation. This was a recommendation from the solar installer. The additional costs would not be worth it, as the system does not deliver full power most of the time anyway (for us, N/E/S/W orientation on three roof sides) - only in summer with perfect irradiation and perfect orientation. What does your solar installer say? He has surely made the relevant calculations for the design of the photovoltaic system and should be able to tell you when which output will be delivered.
 

Similar topics
05.03.2010Passive house, heating combination with solar, energy recovery, photovoltaics?38
22.12.2015Is natural stone heating reasonable in combination with a photovoltaic system?16
09.04.2013Is financing a photovoltaic system unprofitable?11
08.12.2014Smaller photovoltaic system 2 KWp11
12.02.2015Photovoltaic systems & storage systems *collective thread*21
05.06.2015Photovoltaic system for hot water preparation and feeding15
06.08.2015Photovoltaics for hot water26
20.11.2015Solar / Photovoltaic from an economic perspective53
08.01.2016Photovoltaic system: self-consumption rate with battery and further questions27
23.02.2016Photovoltaic + Battery - Which System - Experiences?17
08.06.2017Photovoltaic system, using experiences like a heat pump?64
26.04.201616.03.16: Start of photovoltaic assembly60
16.07.2016KfW 40+ and 10,000 Houses Program - Requirements for Photovoltaics?13
06.04.2016Financing for 15 or 20 years? Photovoltaics via KFW?10
30.05.2016KfW55: Gas or air-water heat pump with/without photovoltaics17
30.05.2016Photovoltaics on the roof as a second layer11
21.06.2016Heat pump with photovoltaics vs gas and solar thermal52
10.07.2016Air-water heat pump with photovoltaics or pellet with solar25
10.11.2021Photovoltaic system: Costs, saving potential? - Experiences?240
02.06.2025Help with photovoltaic decision41

Oben