Liability/Repair of Damage to Exterior Plaster and Insulation

  • Erstellt am 2018-11-19 16:22:15

Mari305

2018-11-19 16:22:15
  • #1
Hello,

We are building a single-family house with a developer. Yesterday, we noticed two fairly large damages on the exterior facade. However, the site manager denies any responsibility, stating that the damage must have been caused by an external company that carried out civil engineering work for the laying of pipes. We are supposed to ask these companies (Avacon, Telekom, etc.) to repair the damage.

Of course, the damage could just as well have been caused by a company commissioned by the developer, but of course, I can't prove anything.

Nevertheless, the developer is obligated to hand over a defect-free house to us, right? Or am I stuck with the costs of repairing the damage?
 

Mottenhausen

2018-11-19 20:38:22
  • #2


"Yes and no." Unfortunately, this is a misconception, based on the fact that general contractors, etc., like to advertise as if it were the case.

It is very complicated. The civil engineer was working on your behalf, so the developer can actually excuse himself if the civil engineer is the cause. The question is, who caused it? You cannot prove who it was, but your developer cannot either, that it wasn’t him. Statement against statement.

How bad is it, anyway? I’m afraid a legal fuss is not worth it.
 

Otus11

2018-11-19 22:55:16
  • #3
Check the construction performance insurance conditions to see if they cover that.
 

Frank Hartung

2018-11-29 17:23:30
  • #4
The question first arises as to on whose behalf the civil engineering company was working. Additionally, there is the question of whether the facade has already been accepted. I would say that until acceptance, the risk of destruction, damage, or accidental loss lies with the contractor, i.e., the developer.
 

Frank Hartung

2018-11-29 17:28:35
  • #5


I see it differently:
Until the acceptance of the building, no risk transfer to the client has occurred. In this respect, the risk lies with the contractor. This could only be different if the damage was caused by a trade acting as an agent of the client. But how should the contractor prove this?
 

Mari305

2018-11-29 18:06:21
  • #6
Fortunately, the civil engineering company we commissioned admitted that they caused the damage and thus accepts liability. Although only after being asked, but at least.
 

Similar topics
06.02.2013Developer says: No more insulation!12
23.03.2011Developer or architect?15
26.09.2011Finding tiles from other manufacturers / sample selection for builders13
09.07.2012Developer offer for single-family house - Are the construction costs acceptable?16
16.07.2012The builder "outsources" fixed-price services to subcontractors12
03.08.2012Contract Supplement to the Construction Contract by the Developer36
30.09.2012Developer - Is withdrawal from the purchase contract possible?11
01.12.2014Real estate transfer tax / what is the tax applied to? Which developer MUST?30
18.02.2014Massive problems with the builder - is contract termination possible?33
23.06.2014Developer charges heavily for replanning - justified?12
08.10.2014How do you search for a suitable property developer?30
27.02.2015Construction project with a developer without an official building plan, is a down payment required?12
01.03.2015The developer does not build according to the plan14
15.04.2015Duplex construction: Joint or separate developer?20
13.06.2015New construction with developer / construction drawing documents23
09.09.2015Buy land separately from the developer13
24.12.2015Single-family house, Energy Saving Ordinance 2016, developer recommends additional insulation - is it sensible?39
15.03.2016Developer changes plot size25
16.03.2016Single-family house - developer rejected25
12.05.2016Individual bathroom planning despite the developer (and saving money...)14

Oben