Is it even worth extending the fixed interest period?

  • Erstellt am 2013-12-03 12:35:26

BTK27

2013-12-03 12:35:26
  • #1
Hello everyone,

since our financing discussions are now entering the final phase, we also have to decide on the length of the fixed interest period.
As is well known, extending from 10 years to 15 years leads to an interest surcharge of 0.4 - 0.75 percentage points depending on the provider.
Assuming a 2-3% repayment, the monthly burden increases accordingly with 15 years, or the repayment rate is reduced.

Assuming one stays with 10 years and compared to 15 years sticks to a higher repayment/special repayment or, if monthly availability allows, tries, for example, to secure part of the financing sum with a building savings contract at an interest level close to today’s, doesn’t this provide an advantage?

I am not a mathematician, banker, or insurance person, so I usually approach things pragmatically. For me, the best case is always that the amount of the follow-up financing remains as low as possible. I always assume an interest level of 6% in 10 years. I have somewhat neglected the financing/interest costs incurred.

In the end, is it a mathematical question or an "emotional" one (longer fixed interest period = longer interest rate security = more peaceful sleep ;))
What of course no one knows is what interest rate awaits us in 10 or 15 years.

What are your opinions or experiences?

Thanks for the answers

BTK
 

BTK27

2013-12-03 12:37:33
  • #2
The term is by the way 25-30 years.
With [Volltilgerdarlehen] the question usually does not arise. :)
 

HilfeHilfe

2013-12-03 12:58:20
  • #3
Hello,

your forecast with 6% is very high and reasonable. If you manage to repay a lot within 10 years, it certainly makes sense. For most, however, it does not. A fixed interest rate period of 15 or even 20 years is a "must".

There are events in life such as children, illness, unemployment that do not allow for repayment. I would always choose the conservative option. Especially since, according to [Baugesetzbuch], you can terminate the loan after 10.5 years without a prepayment penalty.
 

Musketier

2013-12-03 13:34:15
  • #4
That is something everyone can only decide personally for themselves and must be calculated individually. Depending on the forecast of what interest rates will exist after the fixed interest period (10/15/20 years), a 15 or 20 year loan will be worthwhile or not. It also seems that the interest rate jump between the individual fixed interest periods varies from financing to financing. For us, for example, it was very high between 15 and 20 years. For others, this jump was rather between 10 and 15 years.

Since I assume that we will be able to make special repayments at some point (after parental leave and part-time work of the wife), the 20 year loan did not pay off for us, as mentioned above, because the interest rate jump compared to the 15 year one is correspondingly high. The 15 year one, on the other hand, does pay off because we want to make relatively large special repayments by then.
 

BTK27

2013-12-03 17:04:05
  • #5
@backbone: In principle, you are of course right. Depending on the equity and loan amount, the offer for the actual loan develops. However, the surcharge of 0.4-0.7 percentage points from 10 years to 15 years or even 20 years remains in place as far as I know. The banks charge for the longer commitment regardless of whether you have 10%, 20%, or 50% equity. The same applies to the interest rate, whether you have 1.5%, 2.5%, or 5% effective annual interest rate, the 0.4 - 0.7 is added on top when the fixed interest period is extended. Or am I seeing this wrong?
 

Naddl

2013-12-03 17:36:38
  • #6
Hello BTK,

get an offer from the bank and calculate exactly. In our example, the interest rate would have had to increase to 6.3% at 15 years just to break even. The surcharge from 15 to 20 years was only 0.1%, and for 25 years it was even the same as for 20 years. So the long fixed interest period is definitely worthwhile. I think the surcharge is always the same, regardless of how much equity there is. Or has anyone here had different experiences??

Ultimately, it is always a personal decision - one person places more value on interest rate security, the other repays more in the first years and thus has a lower risk after the fixed interest period.

Best regards
 

Similar topics
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
12.12.2013How much house can we afford?16
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
18.12.2015Financing unequal equity ratios of unmarried partners24
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
18.01.2016Financing - where is the mistake?33
13.03.2016What financing options are available for new construction?12
21.04.2016Is financing with land and equity possible like this?20
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
17.05.2017Process of Financing and House Construction10
14.05.2020Financing Land & House - 2 Different Loans34
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
29.12.2020Variable loan possible / sensible?155
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
26.06.2021How much equity is needed for home purchase financing?15
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48

Oben