Lauri
2014-01-21 19:49:57
- #1
Hello! We are currently considering purchasing a plot of land from the municipality (more precisely, a municipal housing company). We read in the development plan about a "geogenically caused slightly elevated heavy metal contamination" and inquired about the details from the city. The sales intermediary is very quick and immediately provided us with the results and also the written statements of the chemical soil report from the neighboring plot, as well as commissioned its own report for "our" plot. I have read the report and it sounds quite alright to me, but of course I am not a chemist. Who could help with the interpretation? I have already inquired about the classes (Z 0 to Z 5 according to LAGA Soil), but I still find the interpretation difficult... I also wouldn’t know who can help us with this? There are, for example, the following formulations: According to the present analysis findings, the native soils are to be classified in assignment value Z 1 according to LAGA Soil due to exceedances of the assignment value Z 0 of the parameters chromium, copper, nickel, zinc and TOC (test pit 1) or hydrocarbons C10-C40 (test pit 2). The fill sample test pit 3 shows an exceedance of the assignment value Z 0 for conductivity as well as for hydrocarbons (C10-C40), so that the fill corresponds to assignment value Z 1.1 according to LAGA Construction Waste. The results of the sample test pit 5 (fill) show exceedances of the assignment value Z 0 of the parameters PAH (EPA), PCB and nickel in the original substance. The hydrocarbons (C10-C40) exceed the assignment value Z 1.2, so that the fill material is to be classified in assignment value Z 2 according to LAGA Construction Waste. The examined topsoil from the soil heap shows exceedances of assignment value Z 0 for lead and zinc. Cadmium exceeds assignment value Z 1.1, so that the topsoil is to be classified in assignment value Z 1.2 according to LAGA Soil. The analyzed recycling material from test pits 4 and 6 meets the criteria for RCL I recycled building material (see report dated 12.07.2013). Therefore – except for the fill soil contaminated with hydrocarbons to be separated (test pit 5) – all investigated native and filled soils on the property can remain. According to the field investigations carried out, chemical analysis results and compaction inspections, it is hereby confirmed that no contaminated soils remain on the property and that the installed soils are sufficiently compacted. The individual chemical values still include mg/kg, which I have removed here. My question now is, are we "on the safe side" with this wording, especially the bolded part at the end, regarding the plot? Does anything still seem odd to you, are such results normal? We are completely clueless and therefore very much appreciate professional advice...