Hello Musketeer,
thank you very much for your detailed answer.
Yes, I have gone through the household budget several times and have reviewed recurring bills. The costs should be correct.
The large item "car" is accurate: I drive a company car. However, since only the 1% rule applies to me (I have no regular workplace), the costs are fixed. This could change in the future, though. Then I might have a regular workplace.
For the second car, we have already included many costs, of course these are all based on estimates since you never know if a repair will be necessary or not. But it is included. What we have not included are the 200-300€ for replacement, since that would then be eliminated. If the second car is broken, I can lease a car cheaply through employee leasing (including taxes, insurance, tires, maintenance, etc.) and don’t have to buy a car for 10,000.00 €. We still have a monthly expense, but it stays around the current amount (the second car is a Polo and would be one again).
Disability insurances are in place. Neither of us has life insurances; we will not take out any either.
In general, I think we only have the really necessary insurances. These are disability insurance and private liability insurance. My girlfriend still has a building savings contract, which I do not, for example.
Of course, there will be more costs, but we cannot estimate them concretely yet because we have not agreed on the energy plan for our house and do not know which construction method we should prefer.
I also estimate about 300-400.00 € for additional costs (is this realistic? - my parents calculated about 500.00 € additional costs per month; but they have an older house). I hope newly built houses are more energy-efficient.
What do you actually pay for additional costs?
Yes, offspring is planned, but only in five to six years.
We would really like to have a house and believe that we can spend 1200.00€ - 1500.00€ (interest + repayment including all additional costs).
We simply made, let's say, a "milkmaid’s calculation": whether we now spend 1000.00€ warm rent + 500.00€ into a building savings contract or whether we invest 1500.00€ including all additional costs directly into our house is somehow the same for us.
We are still very young (some even say too young to build). But I think that our age might even be an advantage because we can spread the repayment over a longer period.
Of course, it would be nice if the house was paid off in 25 years. But we were at a house exhibition and consulted with an architect there. Since we will not have a plot of land, we probably won’t get around the sum of about 400,000.00 €.
The land costs about 100,000.00 €. That leaves "only" 300,000.00 € for the house. I think that’s not very much anyway when you consider that you also have to furnish the house (please correct me if I am wrong).
I am lately also a foe of "building with equity". Of course, 95% of banks require that you have a certain amount of equity. But there are also banks that do 100% financing.
I just don’t see the possibility of saving 50,000 - 100,000 € in the next 5-6 years with an apartment and insurances.
Since the interest rate is at a low point, it can only go up. Then the interest will eat up my existing equity anyway, won’t it?
Isn’t it better to build immediately then? (assuming you get the money and the repayment + interest would be affordable)
Many thanks for your answers
rwurzer