titoz
2016-03-26 03:17:23
- #1
Hello everyone,
we are planning a new building after the demolition of the current house in RLP.
The old house on the north side stands on the boundary.
Theoretically, we could build on the boundary again, but since we are planning the driveway on that side, we have to keep a 3m distance from the boundary. Unfortunately, due to an error by the draftsman, we only had a distance of 2.80m approved by the building authority, so a new plan will probably be necessary.
Now I noticed that the owner to the north built closer to the boundary than shown on the site plan. He built much wider on top of a long narrow old building, so I assume the distance to the boundary is partly less than 2.00m.
What would you recommend to me?
Do I have to accept the neighbor’s small distance to the boundary?
Of course, I don’t want to cause him to have to rebuild, but is it possible to agree informally that we can also build closer to the boundary if he is already closer? Or does it have to go through the building authority in a complicated way, including easements etc.?
On the south side, we were not granted permission for a terrace because due to a slope in the property it no longer counts as a terrace but as a balcony. Here, too, a 3m distance to the southern boundary is required.
I could accept that on my part, but the neighbor to the north also has a roof terrace on the piece of land close to the boundary.
Why is he allowed to have it, but we are not?!
By the way: how can I best graphically represent such spatial situations? Is there a simple tool?
Best regards
Tito
we are planning a new building after the demolition of the current house in RLP.
The old house on the north side stands on the boundary.
Theoretically, we could build on the boundary again, but since we are planning the driveway on that side, we have to keep a 3m distance from the boundary. Unfortunately, due to an error by the draftsman, we only had a distance of 2.80m approved by the building authority, so a new plan will probably be necessary.
Now I noticed that the owner to the north built closer to the boundary than shown on the site plan. He built much wider on top of a long narrow old building, so I assume the distance to the boundary is partly less than 2.00m.
What would you recommend to me?
Do I have to accept the neighbor’s small distance to the boundary?
Of course, I don’t want to cause him to have to rebuild, but is it possible to agree informally that we can also build closer to the boundary if he is already closer? Or does it have to go through the building authority in a complicated way, including easements etc.?
On the south side, we were not granted permission for a terrace because due to a slope in the property it no longer counts as a terrace but as a balcony. Here, too, a 3m distance to the southern boundary is required.
I could accept that on my part, but the neighbor to the north also has a roof terrace on the piece of land close to the boundary.
Why is he allowed to have it, but we are not?!
By the way: how can I best graphically represent such spatial situations? Is there a simple tool?
Best regards
Tito