Heating concept for discussion: gas, solar, and wood

The total costs for your maximum variant are already enormous. You have to integrate three different energy sources with their respective temperature levels and need a really large storage tank, probably with several heat exchangers and a pump for each energy source, plus probably a backup pump for the stove. Even the design and control of the system is likely not achievable by every heating technician. A wood stove probably won’t pay off, whether with or without a water jacket.

You are absolutely right. I have also taken this argument very seriously into my considerations and I have now abandoned the maximum variant (see my previous answer).

I slept on it overnight and the thing with "deleting the last sentence" was a killer argument against my concept.

Didn’t mean it badly, not that it came across as stupid and/or arrogant [emoji4]

A non-magical panoramic stove will be part of our setup as well, with similar usage habits as yours. At first, I also wanted a water jacket, it sounded so tempting to be able to use the heat twice. After thinking it through more carefully (amortization) and impulses from here in the forum, the topic was quickly settled. So it was actually meant constructively, even if it could have been interpreted differently upon a second reading.

Was not meant to be mean, don’t want it to have come across as stupid and/or arrogant [emoji4]

A more basic Pano fireplace is also going in with us, with similar usage behavior as with you. At first I also wanted a water jacket, it sounded so tempting to be able to use the heat twice. Upon further consideration (amortization) and impulses from here in the forum, the topic was quickly settled. So it was actually meant constructively, even though on a second reading it could have been interpreted differently.

Same here with me. I really found your statement important for me. I read my post without the last sentence and had to smile. So all good and thanks for the help