Heat pump for new single-family house efficiency house 55

  • Erstellt am 2023-10-01 14:51:05

OWLer

2023-10-01 19:53:13
  • #1


They also come in small sizes. I don't understand why they market them that way. For example, a 3.5kW air-to-water heat pump makes no sense at all in an old building yet is still marketed under old buildings.

So as long as it is a maximum of 7 kW, it works quite well. However, I would have a big question mark regarding the heating load. According to calculations, the 5kW version would have been sufficient for our KFW 55 house with 200 sqm of heated space - which, however, would no longer have been subsidized by Bafa.
 

ToBu1991

2024-05-27 13:52:15
  • #2
Hello everyone,

so the whole topic is already a bit older, but the house construction company has finally provided us with the heating load calculation. The company now recommends the Vaillant Arotherm Split VWL 75/5 AS. Do you think this is sufficient, or do you see any major flaws in the calculation or the selection?

Somehow I can’t upload the file (it says the file has an unauthorized extension). I hope it works via the link.

Thanks a lot
 

ToBu1991

2024-05-27 21:37:49
  • #3
Hello everyone,

I have now taken screenshots of each page.

Regards ToBu1991
 

RotorMotor

2024-05-27 22:03:30
  • #4
Is no ventilation installed at all?
Why split and not plus?
Do the room temperatures in the calculation match your wishes?
If yes, you should take a 55.
 

ToBu1991

2024-05-28 09:38:36
  • #5

Hello RotorMotor,

No, ventilation is not planned.
The Split was chosen based on previous posts in this thread. The Plus is probably intended more for modernization due to the higher supply temperature.
After reviewing, I would consider the temperatures in the living rooms to be 21 degrees rather than 20. Unfortunately, no one asked us about this.

According to your statement that the 55 should be sufficient, the 75 with the higher temperatures should fit, right?

Regards, ToBu1991
 

RotorMotor

2024-05-28 09:46:04
  • #6

That's a pity.


You seem to have misunderstood something.
From my point of view, the Plus is simply the more modern and better device.
Better/more modern refrigerant, more efficient, later more flexible when the device needs to be replaced, etc.


It's a pity that no one asked or you didn't bring this up.
But one degree more doesn’t make much of a difference.


You would have to calculate again. But I strongly assume that the 75 is still clearly too big and will short-cycle.
With proper planning and design of the hydraulics, I would still recommend the 55.
 

Similar topics
08.05.2015Renovate an old building from 1957 or buy a new building?13
23.07.2016Construction of the driveway with gravel, crushed stone, and paving18
01.08.2017Purchase decision of a listed historic building11
19.03.2018House Extension Split-Level - The First Design20
12.11.2018Panic room in old building Security expert for old building wanted34
25.03.2019Heating concept for single-family house new build approx. 190m²: Split heat pump vs. ground source (brine)13
13.07.2020Renewal of heating system in old building, which system?49
05.02.2021Is renovating old buildings worthwhile?42
19.03.2021Renovation obligation in old buildings, please provide an assessment86
06.01.2022Underfloor heating in old buildings, subsequent installation15
28.01.2022Floor plan planning of an old building from the 1930s63
12.04.2022From when is a heat pump worthwhile in an old building?13
11.03.2022Insulated old building from 1921: Conversion from gas heating31
15.08.2023Combination of split air conditioner, gas, solar12
05.09.2024Split air conditioning and controlled ventilation with heat recovery44
10.04.2023Renovate an old building or build new? Experiences?35
15.09.2023Basic info radiator replacement old building14
04.03.2024Costs for heat pump and photovoltaic in 2024 in small old buildings20
30.03.2024Split-level from 1967 - experiences?45

Oben