Hardly any construction blogs on the Internet

  • Erstellt am 2016-05-03 09:42:44

T21150

2016-05-04 00:23:31
  • #1


No!

I stand by it: client.

The site manager is acting on behalf of the client, not the other way around.
 

Bauexperte

2016-05-04 10:20:48
  • #2
Hello,


That is not correct. Take a look at this thread:



Here _no_ affidavit was required, the OP describes their mostly positive experiences with the provider openly and objectively. Unfortunately, they do not continue the post .... a known phenomenon. An affidavit is required when serious allegations are made against a provider. If there is to be an objective report about this, the forum operator must protect themselves as well as possible. If all requirements are met, it often happens that the OP has their posts deleted again.

It is therefore very difficult to create a somewhat informative page for potential builders if the affidavit is seen as a "high hurdle"—whose advantages are negated for every potential builder—and on the other hand, several OPs have their reports deleted for various reasons.


With this attitude, you are not alone; it also leads to poor information about the market of providers. Of course, the question is what you mean by "too many little things"; craftsmen are certainly not delicate technicians ;)

Regards from the Rhineland
 

Payday

2016-05-04 15:59:16
  • #3
Although our construction really went well, there are some things at the end that are really ridiculous. But it is all the subcontractors who then step out of line. Last week I wrote to the construction company that apparently all known defects have now been addressed, now there is a musty smell in the guest bathroom cupboard after the remodeling of the hot water circulation. It is very likely that the modified hot water pipe is leaking and mold is starting to grow in the drywall installation. Depending on how it was done back then, the damage can possibly be easily repaired or it will get really expensive. Of course, the damage has been reported...
 

Musketier

2016-05-04 16:15:15
  • #4
Ask me, with us the main contractor is allowed to replaster the entire house again in May/June after 1.5 years. And only because the plasterers fixed the rails with something gypsum-containing during correction work on the plaster rails. Now that somehow moisture has penetrated, the plaster around the windows is blown off due to the swelling of the gypsum. The main contractor accepted the defect without any objections and has to bear the full cost because the plastering company is insolvent. The plasterers were also the only trade that already had bigger problems during construction.
 
Oben