GFL & Access according to the development plan - question of understanding

  • Erstellt am 2019-08-09 09:50:09

Harakiri

2019-08-09 09:50:09
  • #1
Hello everyone,

we intend to buy a plot of land, but we want to be sure that we have correctly understood all aspects of the permitted development. Since we are absolute newbies in this field (first project), we only have a layperson’s perspective.

It concerns the permitted or possible access to the property – since it is a corner plot (3264/150), there is a public road at the bottom and next to it on the left a cul-de-sac (3264/161), which is private – belonging to the neighboring multi-family house, mainly used for garbage collection.

However, if we have understood the development plan correctly, this private area is burdened with pedestrian, vehicular, and utility easement 7. The text section of the plan states the following:



Is it then not the case that we could theoretically realize access to our property from this cul-de-sac as well? Or are we completely mistaken here?

For better understanding, I have attached excerpts from the development plan; hopefully, they include all relevant information.
 

Escroda

2019-08-09 10:48:48
  • #2

Theoretically yes. In practice, actual rights must be established from the planning intention of the development plan, i.e., you need to get in touch with the owner to have an easement and/or building obligation registered in the land register or building obligations directory. In this process, rights and obligations should be recorded in writing as comprehensively as possible.
 

kaho674

2019-08-09 11:29:26
  • #3
Well, let's think about it. If it were my street and my future neighbor came along to make it clear to me that from now on he wants to use my street as well and would like this to be registered in the land register as a burden on my street... that would be expensive. oops:
 

Spike86

2020-08-09 18:10:55
  • #4
Hi, I don't want to start a new topic again...

The problem on our side is that we have a rear property. The GFL right is recorded in the land register, but the Berlin Water Utility now said that this wording needs to be supplemented (keyword "inspection shafts") or added to the encumbrance. Now to the actual problem, the neighbor from the front property sold the house + land on 30.09. To what extent can he/she still make changes now? Or do we now have to arrange all this with the new buyers? It was actually agreed that we would have this entered with the current owner before the sale... Typical case of learning the hard way, always obediently saying YES AND AMEN to everything because we are the new neighbors and didn't want to mess it up.

Best regards
 

Similar topics
25.03.2012Land now - house construction next year23
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
08.01.2014Opinions on the hillside property22
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
02.07.2014Realistic purchase of land and new construction of a single-family house & how to finance it?20
24.07.2014Buy public parking lot next to the property17
16.06.2015Take the property or wait and accept the risk?22
06.01.2015First buy the plot, then calmly plan and build...?11
16.02.2015Property purchased - Is financing/loan for house possible?13
15.10.2015No construction, as there is no building obligation62
14.04.2015Uneconomic development plan31
17.06.2015Is a building load possible despite designation?18
17.08.2015Expand property11
05.10.2017Property / Development Plan / Retaining Walls / Excavations17
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
09.07.2020Register a building burden retroactively on your own property?13
30.01.2022Plot 4500 m² (nursery) - preparation of development plan independently16
29.06.2023Position of garage on property, specification in development plan22
03.08.2024Nice plot of land, but is the development plan too restrictive?21

Oben