Thomas Faerber
2021-10-29 23:59:21
- #1
Hello everyone,
this week a new front door was delivered and installed at our place. In my opinion, the door was delivered too large and was not installed into the wall opening but was mounted from the inside against the wall. Unfortunately, I was not on site and another family member basically allowed this installation.

So, now I am thinking about how to deal with this. The responsible company believes that they measured specifically and that everything is as ordered. I will pull myself together now and spare myself and you from going into this further.
For me, this is completely unexpected. The exterior wall is an undamped 45 cm thick and will also be fitted with external insulation as a result. I even had the wall opening specially enlarged beforehand. I would never have dreamed of not installing the door in the middle. Especially since there is no insulation in the wall opening now and at least the lintel still has to be plastered. So I can no longer add insulation in front of it. Maybe a maximum of 1 cm, but then the door jamb virtually closes off with the insulation. Since it is an old building and the walls are not straight, correspondingly large gaps arise (in which there is at least sealing tape), as can also be seen in the photo. This did not really matter with the interior plaster because no one expected the door to be installed there. The door frame is now to be clad and the gaps closed. There are also pre-drilled holes in the frame with which frames are normally anchored in the door opening.
What actually interests me now is whether one does such a thing at all? Assuming the misunderstanding is my fault, would something like this be acceptable from a craftsmanship or professional point of view? Since the exterior wall in the door opening cannot be insulated, I firmly assume that this must lead to a thermal bridge. Is my assumption correct?
this week a new front door was delivered and installed at our place. In my opinion, the door was delivered too large and was not installed into the wall opening but was mounted from the inside against the wall. Unfortunately, I was not on site and another family member basically allowed this installation.
So, now I am thinking about how to deal with this. The responsible company believes that they measured specifically and that everything is as ordered. I will pull myself together now and spare myself and you from going into this further.
For me, this is completely unexpected. The exterior wall is an undamped 45 cm thick and will also be fitted with external insulation as a result. I even had the wall opening specially enlarged beforehand. I would never have dreamed of not installing the door in the middle. Especially since there is no insulation in the wall opening now and at least the lintel still has to be plastered. So I can no longer add insulation in front of it. Maybe a maximum of 1 cm, but then the door jamb virtually closes off with the insulation. Since it is an old building and the walls are not straight, correspondingly large gaps arise (in which there is at least sealing tape), as can also be seen in the photo. This did not really matter with the interior plaster because no one expected the door to be installed there. The door frame is now to be clad and the gaps closed. There are also pre-drilled holes in the frame with which frames are normally anchored in the door opening.
What actually interests me now is whether one does such a thing at all? Assuming the misunderstanding is my fault, would something like this be acceptable from a craftsmanship or professional point of view? Since the exterior wall in the door opening cannot be insulated, I firmly assume that this must lead to a thermal bridge. Is my assumption correct?