Foundation formwork made of Poroton bricks

You are mistaking me. But fine, I accept your unwillingness to answer my questions. Shame. Have fun continuing to waffle.

This question naturally arises for me as well, I would also like to be able to weigh to what extent I should/must "force" the general contractor to correctly comply with the DIN or whether this can also be regulated by monetary deductions. But I would be interested in the consequences of this, although it is of course difficult to assess to what extent the grounding protection actually works if it is not tested.

Ideally, there is simply no test report and everything would work? In the worst case, a lightning strike would cause all the electrical equipment to fail and I might also have problems with the insurance?

Doesn't the electrician actually check whether the grounding is functioning correctly during his work?

I am also not an EFK who performs house installations day in and day out, and certainly not lightning protection constructions.

Then one should also not give the impression of being an EFK working in the industry who can assess the execution of foundation earth electrodes. That is how I interpreted the sentence. For someone who accuses me of babbling with references to standards, you are a bit too sensitive.

Doesn't the electrician check during their work whether the grounding is functioning correctly?

The countless meter registrations in which grounding systems never seen before were "blindly" certified as compliant by electricians after just a glance at a piece of steel protruding from the ground allow only three possibilities:

[*]They possess "paranormal" healing abilities
[*]They do it against better knowledge out of favor and fear of losing follow-up contracts
[*]They do it unscrupulously because they themselves do not know DIN 18014 and the test protocol has only been required for "12 years"

Even if connection flags are already rusting in the shell construction, this is apparently no reason for objection in the meter registration, because this is completely normal for hot-dip galvanized material, right?

7 Documentation and continuity measurement

7.1 General

Before the concrete is poured, documentation according to 7.2 must be created and a continuity measurement according to 7.3 must be performed by an electrical or lightning protection specialist.

The interesting question remains what practical consequences result from a non-standard-compliant creation. This seems to be of practical and everyday relevance, as it apparently rarely complies with the standards. Everyone has probably understood that it does not correspond to the state of the art. What effects does this have in practice? I am a layperson, so it would be nice if it were explained with simply formulated examples.