Fireplace - Misplanning by architects / general contractor

  • Erstellt am 2018-03-17 00:23:00

Arifas

2018-03-17 14:32:36
  • #1
Yes. The picture with the black chimney is from the building application, where the chimney can be found on the 1st floor, where it was planned and drawn in from the beginning, by the way. There was never talk of a chimney on the ground floor.

The red chimney stands for the change that we supposedly caused now with our choice of chimney. According to our chimney builder, however, the original (black) chimney height only works with a grotesquely low chimney with a connection height of 40cm. According to your knowledge, something like that does not exist at all.
 

toxicmolotof

2018-03-17 15:00:08
  • #2
Have the chimney builders and general contractors ever spoken with each other? Maybe even before the building application?

I consider 40cm connection height to be very daring.

There are certainly stoves that manage with 2m draft, but rather rarely in a single-family house.

Have you ever thought about draft support?
 

ruppsn

2018-03-17 15:18:38
  • #3


I’m sorry to hear that. Nevertheless, you also seem to be of the opinion that the doctor did not fulfill his responsibility here, right? It wasn’t about who is right, but about who bears the responsibility.
 

Knallkörper

2018-03-17 15:39:34
  • #4
Since I sometimes come into contact with chimneys professionally, here are two notes:

1. Technically, the chimney can also easily start on the upper floor. I have planned and built this several times myself (although not for stoves).
2. The maximum height of the system above the last wall bracket depends on the manufacturer and the nominal diameter. Perhaps something could still be done here.

Personally, I would do without such a chimney. Nowadays, I would probably save the money for the stove and chimney completely.
 

11ant

2018-03-17 15:51:56
  • #5

Yes, but please not on an eaves side – and a hipped roof simply doesn’t have gable sides. By the way, this is a realization that an architect shouldn’t need a chimney sweep for, nor a conversation with the carpenter as the specialist planner for the roof.
 

Tego12

2018-03-17 16:03:42
  • #6
Definitely leave that out, I actually liked the objection about the aquarium visually, a chimney on a hip roof is really a disaster, above all at this height.
 

Similar topics
02.01.2012Semi-detached house - who submits the building application first, wins?29
29.10.2013Property reserved, construction financing plan, architect/building permit application21
08.11.2014Forgot drainage connection chimney10
17.12.2014Building application "deferred". What does that mean?19
28.02.2015Building application submitted/open detailed questions/looking forward to suggestions39
15.06.2015Garage - Building Application - Confusion36
09.07.2015Chimney in the masonry and not in front of it16
13.10.2015Placement chimney / panoramic fireplace12
30.10.2015Can the building application be submitted this year?14
05.01.2016Chimney drawn incorrectly16
01.02.2017Building application is becoming increasingly complicated!20
27.04.2017Carport deviation from the building application21
07.06.2017Permeable traffic areas in the building application17
04.08.2017Building application or building notification15
30.06.2018Moving the chimney inside the wall - Advantages - Disadvantages?16
30.08.2019Repurpose chimney - ideas?16
12.04.2020Chimney Positioning New Construction - Tips16
05.06.2020Chimney not properly sealed? Rain coming in - who pays?17
15.10.2021What to do if a wrong chimney has been installed?22
28.12.2021Install chimney as a precaution12

Oben