Financing with KfW - Construction company struggles

  • Erstellt am 2011-12-14 23:34:33

lyander

2011-12-14 23:34:33
  • #1
Hi everyone!

The following situation – my wife and I want to build in Berlin.

The plot has been found and I already have the preliminary contract in hand.

At the same time, we are looking for a construction company to go through with it.

Since we don’t have 300k in our pocket, financing naturally comes into play.
Basically, we now have 2 options from the F-consulting that suit us –
one with and one without KFW.

For the loan application with KfW, for an Efficiency 70 house, in our case,
KfW wants the application form filled out and signed by the construction company.

So, and here’s the thing: the company we (actually) want to build with,
now said – no no, you won’t get anything without a contract.

The reasoning was, I quote:

“The subject of this application must be a specific project, consisting of a construction contract and a corresponding thermal protection certificate, taking into account the plot-specific conditions.”

So, all true to the motto first sign, negotiate later.

That made us very suspicious, especially since the F-consultant said
that usually reputable companies sign such an application without any ifs or buts,
when it’s a run-of-the-mill project.

And it IS a run-of-the-mill project, a house from a catalog. Above all, I studied civil engineering myself, so as for “plot-specific conditions”...
such nonsense.

My question to you, dear forum members – what experience have you had with such KfW applications and construction companies?
What do you think, is it still worth talking to the company?

So far, we have only had one conversation with the project manager with the ^ company, and one conversation with the F-consultant (whom we have now dropped). The house already appeals to us,
but since we want to change the layout on the ground floor (because of an otherwise unfavorably located entrance), we naturally wanted to talk to planners first and see a few examples of the changes.
And the project manager now comes with “first sign, then negotiate”...

I really don’t like that.

Thanks for your opinions!

L
 

Bauexperte

2011-12-15 10:21:56
  • #2
Hello,


With all due respect, your F-consultant is not all there :confused: As a construction engineer, you should also know that a structural engineer has to confirm this form with his signature. He will hardly do that if the floor plans are not finalized, the location of the property etc. is not known to him, and his work is not paid.


If you are sure that you really want to build with this provider, you should propose to conclude a planning contract for form 153. The costs should be around +/- € 500.00 and must be credited in a later contract for work.


If this statement refers to form 153, it is his legitimate right. If it generally concerns the design of the floor plans, I would suggest that you have not yet found your partner in the building project.

Basically, I would advise you to wait with the KfW application until you are sure you have found the right provider for you ;)

Kind regards
 

lyander

2011-12-15 20:59:17
  • #3
Evening,

first of all, thanks for the feedback.


Why is that, please?


Well, that's exactly the point. The P-manager (actually, he's not really one, but more of a salesperson), does not argue with "structural engineering etc.". Rather bluntly – first contract, then the rest. Because – the floor plan is known (we're not talking about the position of the drywall walls here; load-bearing walls stay where they are). The location and soil condition of the property are also known (the P-manager already has all the documents). + they are building a house 100 meters further, so soil characteristics are also known. + the house is, as the guy himself says, one of the most frequently built houses (at the company). So much for them not having structural engineering, energy certificates, etc.


Yeah, well, I could possibly live with such a protection fee maybe.... Even though the F-consultant just said – "with a reputable company, you shouldn't incur *any* costs beforehand, not before the contract is signed."


Hm, this is not about right or wrong. Fortunately, we're not at that point. It's simply about me, as a customer, wanting to invest a ton of money, and basically being shoved the contract under my nose without any prior service & thorough issue clarification. Someone has to make the advance payment! And IMHO, that should be done by the one who ultimately earns the money from the other – the construction company.


Found – no, that’s true, I am/we are still searching. Floor plan – yes, we already know exactly how it should look like.

Greetings

L
 

Bauexperte

2011-12-16 12:25:23
  • #4
Hello,

There is no standard project; even typical house types are adapted to the wishes of potential builders, so they - considered individually - are a new plan, to which no existing statics/WSV apply. A "reputable" financial broker knows that and would therefore not throw such a statement into the room, nor say it to a customer. In this respect, my statement and, admittedly, the repeated hint to reconsider the financial advisor ;)

Whatever a "P-manager" is supposed to be – he pressures you with half-knowledge and you should – especially given your education – seriously consider showing the provider the door that a carpenter has prepared for such cases!

No, it is a misconception to assume that soil conditions within 100 meters straight line must be unchanged! I myself have experienced more than once that even in semi-detached houses different soil conditions occur. We do not build a single house without a soil survey – if the interested party still insists, we waive the contract and wish them success in finding a suitable provider!

As you describe the situation so far, the salesperson just wants to take you off the market, has no clue, and you as an engineer don’t doubt?

Question: Imagine you are on the "other side" and an interested party walks into your engineering office demanding proof from you that you know will cost you work and time and that you will certainly have to vouch personally for the correctness of the information – do you do that out of pure charity without compensation for your expenses or do you inform that interested party that for your work, logically, an invoice will follow?

Regarding the financial advisor, I already wrote, ask him which provider he considers "reputable" and please post it here; I could imagine that the cause of the "recommendation" allows further conclusions :(

And additionally, should he assign an external order free of charge (very few providers have a permanently employed structural engineer), although it is still unclear whether you will even sign a contract? Strange attitude...

Then I understand even less why you already want a KfW certificate now when it’s not yet certain that you want to build with this provider at all? For this 153 form not only the floor plan must be known, also, for example, the building system, the technology used etc. are the basis of this calculation for the form.

Again: the way I see it, you should seriously reconsider the carpenter’s work mentioned above and look for truly reputable providers – including an independent financial broker – for your construction project; if necessary, then sign a planning contract for the form. Then your risk is manageable … although I also cannot comprehend your financial advisor from another perspective (or you are withholding from him that you have not yet made a final decision for a provider): What use is a completed 153 form to you if its calculations do not correspond in any way to the later single-family house to be built?

Not only banks, but partly also municipalities require this certificate and do not joke at all when the content does not correspond with reality :rolleyes:

Kind regards
 

€uro

2011-12-16 14:13:16
  • #5
Hello,
That's right, every construction project is specific and individual, even if it is a so-called "standard project"! Because even the climate location and user behavior are variable!
That really needs no further comment! ;)
That's right! I can provide a concrete example! A commercial building where single-family houses were built safely on the left and right. The client wanted to save the soil report! Consequence: a tuff hole, => excavation => huge additional effort afterwards!

Best regards.
 

lyander

2012-01-10 22:39:53
  • #6
ok, ok...

Thanks for the answers...


In the meantime, we have decided on a different developer - the conversation was noticeably more open, serious, and many times more informative from the very beginning.

We have now commissioned the soil investigation before purchasing the property, and it will be done in about 1-2 weeks. In the worst case, if the property is not purchased, we will lose just under 1K €.

Thanks again for the ideas!

Regards

L
 

Similar topics
12.05.2014KfW 70 without ventilation system107
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
30.05.2012Massive house costs KFW 70 - Prefabricated house65
02.09.2013Angular bungalow on 800m² plot - financially feasible?16
06.11.2012Costs for energy consultant proof KFW7018
01.06.2014KfW funding measures started late13
21.04.2015Terraced house - Financial framework, land + construction financing13
30.04.2015Which provider for KFW 70 / house construction for €250,000?24
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
30.03.2016Energy consultant recommends KFW 55 - Recommended with solid construction?21
11.09.2016KfW - Construction supervision / verification / acceptance23
16.01.2016KfW-70 standard not reached (bungalow)21
18.11.2021KfW funding for KfW 40 Plus houses from now and from 01.07.202157
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
21.10.2023Land and home financing - together or separately?54
19.07.2024Application KfW 442 Solar Power for Electric Cars42
16.08.2024Buy land with cash, construction through KfW/NRW Bank27
08.12.2024Do KfW requirements influence home buying for families, any experiences?14
02.04.2025KFW Definition of "Ownership" / KFW 30012

Oben