Financing detached single-family house (new construction)

  • Erstellt am 2018-06-10 12:22:37

torino

2018-06-10 12:22:37
  • #1
Hello,

we are planning the construction of a new single-family house in a good to very good location in BY.

Here are the key data:

Land costs including additional costs: 240,000,- (already paid)
Construction costs: 630,000,- EUR
Additional equity: 30,000,- EUR

Financing requirement: 600,000,- EUR

We have the following offer with 3 components from the house bank.

Component 1:
Building savings contract with pre-financing ([LBS-W4 X30])
Loan amount: 300,000,- EUR
Term until full repayment: 24 years + 11 months

Savings rate: 1014 EUR (10 years + 7 months)
Interest on financing amount: 322.50 EUR (nominal interest rate 1.29% / 10 years + 7 months)
Repayment rate after allocation: 1200 EUR (nominal interest rate 2.25% / 14 years + 4 months)
Total costs: 75,683.09 EUR
Effective annual interest rate: 1.98%

Component 2:
Annuitized loan (house bank)
Loan amount: 200,000,- EUR
Nominal interest rate: 1.5% (fixed for 10 years)
Repayment rate: 583.34 EUR

Component 3:
Annuitized loan (insurance)
Loan amount: 100,000,- EUR
Nominal interest rate: 1.9% (fixed for 20 years)
Repayment rate: 325,- EUR

What do you think specifically about component 1 (building savings contract)? Personally, I like it at first glance because you get an interest rate of 1.98% for 25 years fixed interest. Mathematically, I even come to an interest rate of about 1.88% if I calculate the total costs of 75,000 EUR with the loan amount of 300,000 EUR spread over 25 years.
I would possibly cancel component 2 (10 years) and shift it into component 3 (20 years). In my opinion, this makes more sense in the current low interest rate phase and also increases planning security.

Are the offered conditions okay so far? Generally, interest rates have fallen a bit again in recent weeks.

I look forward to your feedback!
 

Fuchur

2018-06-10 12:40:11
  • #2
I am not a fan of these building savings products at all. Hidden costs, hardly calculable effective interest rates, and inflexible handling. Hardly anyone who concludes this understands the instrument down to the last detail. Still, at first glance (without recalculating) it looks quite reasonable and seems to be a real option for you.

Regarding the rest: Too many components with different terms. A large amount with a short term and a smaller amount with a long term doesn't really make sense. How about combining the two with a fixed interest period of 15 years? 20 years is often significantly worse.

And a personal note: For an equity quota of 71%, I don't find the loan interest rate outstanding. Not really bad, but not impressive either.
 

HilfeHilfe

2018-06-11 08:17:12
  • #3
Also find too many components with different terms. Trapped at the bank / group for years because in follow-up financing there will be ranking problems with the assignment of the mortgage. Have a broker offer you a totally ordinary loan with a fixed term of 15-20 years.
 

torino

2018-06-24 14:04:04
  • #4
Thank you very much for the initial feedback!

We have now removed the component with the 20 years and redistributed the sum as follows:

450 TEUR to the building savings contract
150 TEUR for a 10-year annuity loan

Reasoning: I find the building savings contract very interesting in terms of conditions, as a large part of the financing amount is secured over the entire term (approx. 25 years) at an effective interest rate of 1.88%.

The remaining 150 TEUR is somewhat more risk-taking over 10 years. The interest rate here is 1.5%, which is rather average, as this loan is also in second lien. I would then repay this loan as quickly as possible through possible special repayments. But even if a high remaining debt should still exist after 10 years, the risk of a significant interest rate increase is fairly cushioned.

Are the considerations understandable so far and, from your point of view, reasonable?
 

Karlstraße

2018-06-24 14:35:19
  • #5
We have the same amount: 20y full repayment 400k at 1.69 and 200k at 1.33 for 10y fixed period. We found a balanced mix
 

Bookstar

2018-06-25 20:27:04
  • #6
But it's also a pretty nasty interest rate. It has been significantly better before.
 

Similar topics
20.05.2013Question: 1% repayment and 10 years fixed interest rate. Will the house never be paid off?13
05.10.2014Building a house without equity26
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
16.09.2015Home bank financing, building society saver, repayment11
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
28.11.2015Building savings contract with advance loan versus annuity loan13
17.02.2016Loan with annuity loan and 2 linked building savings contracts47
09.05.2016100k€ equity and no idea yet16
11.07.2016Interest rate fixation - financing assessment23
18.08.2017No building savings/little equity and construction/purchase plans in the near future?18
17.12.2017Does the land value count as equity? Appointment at the main bank23
18.01.2018Financing offer for a core renovation15
02.07.2019Financing with a 35-year fixed interest rate52
04.06.2020Is building a semi-detached house sensible despite low equity with a long loan term?79
29.07.2019Bullet loans & annuity loans combined - sensible?28
14.12.2019Fixed interest rate for the entire term or only 10 years?52
23.07.2020How is a 400k loan financible without equity? Net equity at €4,500293
18.12.2024Construction financing without equity as an option?162
17.12.2023Financing at the house bank - Offer evaluation46

Oben