Fencing / Neighborhood Law Brandenburg

Hello dear people!
We have acquired a part of a large property.
The large property is divided into three parts and the two rear properties are provided with a right of way, driving and utility rights.
According to the neighborhood law in Brandenburg, the right neighbor is responsible for fencing the property boundary from the street side.
But how does it look with hammer-shaped properties?

Thank you very much.
Kind regards

Exactly. The access side for the property determines the left and right. Property 3 has the obligation towards Property 2, G 2 at G 1.

Sounds logical. Thanks

If only it were that simple ...

The large plot is divided into three parts

Real or ideal?

the two rear plots

Where is the back, where is the front?

from the street

What is a street?

But what about hammer plots?

What does a hammer plot look like in your opinion?

G 2 at G 1

Exactly the opposite. The owner of plot 1, if the orange line is to be a plot boundary, must erect the enclosure on the border to plot 2 (orange/red line).

So that we are talking about the same areas and border sections, here are two modified sketches:
1.


2.


for case 1: owner 106 must enclose section d, 105, 104 and 107 have no common street boundary, so no joint enclosure is required
for case 2: owner 106 must enclose section c, 105 f, 104 j, 109 m

According to my understanding of "hammer plot," there is none in my sketches. I would designate the combination of 104 and 109 as a hammer plot.

Exactly the other way around.

Sorry! I actually meant it exactly the other way *embarrassed* So: G1 is obligated towards G2, G2 towards G3 In NDS the law counts the same way, I once dealt with nested properties there.

Real or ideal?

Real

Where is the back, where is the front?

Street is in front

What is a street?

Main street, access to the properties.

What does a hammer-shaped property look like in your opinion?

Properties that have no direct access to a street and acquire a right of way, driving, and utility easement over another property by land registry entry. *It’s like at school: question answer

Exactly the other way around. The owner of property 1, if the orange line is supposed to be a property boundary, must build the enclosure on the boundary to property 2 (orange/red line).

So that we are talking about the same areas and boundary sections, here are two modified sketches: 1. [ATTACH alt="Rechtseinfriedung.png"]41470[/ATTACH]

2.

[ATTACH alt="Rechtseinfriedung2.png"]41471[/ATTACH]
for case 1: owner 106 must enclose section d, 105, 104 and 107 have no common street boundary, so no joint enclosure is necessary

It is about case 1. In the initial sketch, property 1 lies directly on the street and does not use the area of right of way, driving, and utility easement (GFL) on its property. Properties 2 and 3 rely on the GFL to access their properties. Property 2 also grants property 3 a GFL so that it can gain access to its property. Thus, 1 is "in front" and 2 + 3 are "in the back". When it comes to the enclosure, the explanation by "ypg" sounds logical. I find your additions about the joint enclosure helpful, thank you very much.