Tichu78
2015-12-21 19:16:35
- #1
Hello,
I am currently wondering how it would be practically possible to adhere to the ideal sequence for building a house in order to maintain as precise an economic efficiency as possible for the various components within the agreed budget.
Many homeowners always ask themselves the question "Is it worth it?". But unfortunately, the answer comes much later when the damage is already done.
For me, the heating load calculation (HLB) is a central answer for the economic efficiency of a house or its components. However, this is only done when all components have already been determined or even built. With the prefab house supplier/general contractor/main contractor, it probably becomes even more expensive to have such flexibility.
We have about €10,000 left, which we now want to invest sensibly. The first thought was to improve the masonry. From T9 (unfilled) to a T7 (filled). This is supposed to save real money later.
Assuming we have an offer from the mason ... €4,000 surcharge compared to the T9. Actually, only the HLB can roughly tell me in how many years the saved heating costs will have neutralized the surcharge. I am aware that it also depends on how efficient my heating system works converting electricity to heat, how cold it will be in the coming years, etc. But you still get a rough figure. Not to forget, that the investment will also cost interest, which will have a compound interest effect over the years of repayment. But all of this can be calculated ... theoretically.
So would it help to do the HLB in advance and evaluate it with various values and the corresponding costs? Which again is not exactly cheap to commission ... and I believe that is the main reason why this is not done in practice, right?
I am currently wondering how it would be practically possible to adhere to the ideal sequence for building a house in order to maintain as precise an economic efficiency as possible for the various components within the agreed budget.
Many homeowners always ask themselves the question "Is it worth it?". But unfortunately, the answer comes much later when the damage is already done.
For me, the heating load calculation (HLB) is a central answer for the economic efficiency of a house or its components. However, this is only done when all components have already been determined or even built. With the prefab house supplier/general contractor/main contractor, it probably becomes even more expensive to have such flexibility.
We have about €10,000 left, which we now want to invest sensibly. The first thought was to improve the masonry. From T9 (unfilled) to a T7 (filled). This is supposed to save real money later.
Assuming we have an offer from the mason ... €4,000 surcharge compared to the T9. Actually, only the HLB can roughly tell me in how many years the saved heating costs will have neutralized the surcharge. I am aware that it also depends on how efficient my heating system works converting electricity to heat, how cold it will be in the coming years, etc. But you still get a rough figure. Not to forget, that the investment will also cost interest, which will have a compound interest effect over the years of repayment. But all of this can be calculated ... theoretically.
So would it help to do the HLB in advance and evaluate it with various values and the corresponding costs? Which again is not exactly cheap to commission ... and I believe that is the main reason why this is not done in practice, right?