Digitalstrom Function Examples - Costs?

  • Erstellt am 2014-12-29 09:00:49

f-pNo

2015-12-26 22:57:28
  • #1


Well.
KNX is indeed a great thing.
Those who didn’t consider it during construction (e.g., for cost reasons) might later look for a way to retrofit it.
Whether this "fuss" is necessary or not is up to each person to judge and also depends on personal preferences/taste. I think most people who think about such solutions are not really concerned with the "automatic starting of the coffee machine."


It’s a pity that it didn’t work out. Although I haven’t dealt with this topic intensively yet, I keep an eye out for feasible alternatives.
 

moasta

2015-12-27 15:24:23
  • #2
Hello to all interested parties

I haven’t been able to deal further with Digitalstrom since the summer but of course I still keep an eye on it. The system would still be a good thing if it were faster. You just have to know that with KNX you have to buy expensive software and the components are also expensive. The systems are no different in that respect. Advantage Digitalstrom no system software Disadvantage slow switching time. So if they would finally do something about it, they could achieve a market breakthrough. As it is, definitely not, which is a shame because it is simple and would not overwhelm any installer.
Digitalstrom has it in their own hands whether they constantly want to launch some gimmick of functions on the market, or whether they want to and can solve the main problem.
If it were faster I would immediately start informing my customers about it and try to position it in the market.
 

Similar topics
01.09.2016Is Smarthome KNX automation possible based on the floor plan?81

Oben