YvesB
2013-11-13 17:57:08
- #1
Hello everyone,
after several months and numerous rounds of planning a single-family house, we now have an implementation plan as well as tender results, which in total are significantly above our specifications and expectations. As a result, we sought direct talks with a construction company and received feedback that the content and thus the total amount of the shell construction tender indeed do not hit the mark. Without going into detail, unnecessary costs of about 20,000 EUR were identified.
Basically, I am of the opinion that, besides the actual, time-based work of a planner (architect), especially adherence to the specified budget is an essential part of the assignment. If this is not possible, e.g., if I provide a much too low budget, an architect should of course communicate this clearly and as soon as possible. But if, as in our case, construction costs increase even from estimate to tender, the goal is missed. Especially since at the "halfway point" we clearly pointed out the budget and the necessary cost reduction measures.
In short: If I receive plans, drawings, and folders for a million-dollar villa, I can’t do anything with them at all.
What is your view on this? I am more concerned with the contractual background here and not with assigning blame or similar.
Best regards
after several months and numerous rounds of planning a single-family house, we now have an implementation plan as well as tender results, which in total are significantly above our specifications and expectations. As a result, we sought direct talks with a construction company and received feedback that the content and thus the total amount of the shell construction tender indeed do not hit the mark. Without going into detail, unnecessary costs of about 20,000 EUR were identified.
Basically, I am of the opinion that, besides the actual, time-based work of a planner (architect), especially adherence to the specified budget is an essential part of the assignment. If this is not possible, e.g., if I provide a much too low budget, an architect should of course communicate this clearly and as soon as possible. But if, as in our case, construction costs increase even from estimate to tender, the goal is missed. Especially since at the "halfway point" we clearly pointed out the budget and the necessary cost reduction measures.
In short: If I receive plans, drawings, and folders for a million-dollar villa, I can’t do anything with them at all.
What is your view on this? I am more concerned with the contractual background here and not with assigning blame or similar.
Best regards