Building permit red dot vs. notification green dot

Good day everyone,

I recently purchased a plot of land in a new development area and plan to submit a building application there in the near future (the architect).
In our area, the notification procedure is possible.

However, I currently have an architect who will only carry out service phases 1-5 and then is done (PL through friend). My concern is that if I apply for the green point, there may later be discrepancies and the architect is no longer involved, or I might have trouble later.

Although I know that the green point is cheaper and much faster, I am considering initiating the red point (regular building application).

How would you handle such a situation?
Please provide assistance and tips.

Unfortunately, I could not find anything on this topic.

Many thanks in advance for your efforts and suggestions.

Best regards

Your concerns are IMHO only justified if the architect is not insured and is planning to emigrate shortly. If he has assumed responsibility in the notification procedure, then he is liable for his planning. What discrepancies are you afraid of?

Your concerns are IMHO only justified if the architect is not insured and plans to emigrate shortly. If he has taken responsibility in the notification procedure, then he is liable for his planning.
What inconsistencies do you fear?

Hello,

my concern is to take on an additional risk.

In such a case, if something does not match, I have to struggle a lot with it.

With Rotpunkt, if I understood correctly, the office already tells me in the process what the "No Gos" are and I do not have any major or critical discussions later.. =? or?

Best regards

to take an additional risk

It is correct that the draft author and the client bear responsibility for compliance with all regulations. In this regard, the trained professional naturally bears by far the greatest part. If that person is no longer available, you must of course step in. With a career beginner or a gifted designer but awful regulations expert, your risk does increase, but it is already in the architect’s own interest to plan reasonably. And a single-family house in a development plan area is not overly complicated.

At Rotpunkt, if I understood correctly, the authority already tells me in the process what are "No Gos" and I then do not have any major or critical discussions later.. =? or?

Yes, but the review effort in the simplified procedure is quite limited. Sure, someone else looks over it again, and usually in the notification procedure someone else also looks over it – but without obligation and responsibility. Whether the effort is worthwhile depends on your trust in the planner, the development plan, and the authority.
In any case, your consideration has nothing to do with the fact that only service phases 1-5 are taken over. Regardless of whether §51 or §52 applies, your draft author owes you regulation-compliant planning and is liable for it.

And a single-family house in a development plan area is not all that complicated.

In the specific case of the exploitation of the building plot endowed with a quarter-circle line, I do see risks, but rather with the surveying of the construction site than on the planning side. I had linked you the example of in the other thread – if I recall correctly, there were problems due to inaccuracies in height measurements.