daytona
2016-01-05 07:27:33
- #1
Hello everyone,
regarding the situation: A rectangular undeveloped plot with plenty of trees (firs >5m) in a row on one side of the plot. The distance between the trees varies between 1-2m.
Now the plot has been roughly halved and the new property boundary runs exactly between the trees, so that half of the trees stand on plot A and the other half on plot B.
Due to the development and optical aspects, all trees on plot A are to be felled.
However, the circumstance arises that some trees on plot B stand "relatively close" or in the corridor at the newly created property boundary. The Thuringian Neighborhood Act would theoretically require a 4m distance for all firs.
How do you assess the situation: Can one insist on the felling of the trees on plot B which stand in the 4m corridor, or is there anything like protection of existing structures or because of the newly created property boundary???? (Yes, I am aware that communication between the parties helps as well, but I only want to consider the legal aspect here!)
regarding the situation: A rectangular undeveloped plot with plenty of trees (firs >5m) in a row on one side of the plot. The distance between the trees varies between 1-2m.
Now the plot has been roughly halved and the new property boundary runs exactly between the trees, so that half of the trees stand on plot A and the other half on plot B.
Due to the development and optical aspects, all trees on plot A are to be felled.
However, the circumstance arises that some trees on plot B stand "relatively close" or in the corridor at the newly created property boundary. The Thuringian Neighborhood Act would theoretically require a 4m distance for all firs.
How do you assess the situation: Can one insist on the felling of the trees on plot B which stand in the 4m corridor, or is there anything like protection of existing structures or because of the newly created property boundary???? (Yes, I am aware that communication between the parties helps as well, but I only want to consider the legal aspect here!)