konibar
2021-09-15 10:42:07
- #1
I would be interested in the experience and strategy regarding your real roof-mounted photovoltaic systems:
To get maximum capacity on the roof, the panels will be mounted almost flush against each other.
So the installation starts at the top, the panels are mounted row by row and pre-assembled accordingly.
Then the next row below, and so on, down to the bottom.
So far, so good.
But if you have to replace a panel (hail damage, contact corrosion, etc.) or just do a diagnosis, it becomes quite complex.
Stepping on them is not an option!
No one will want to start removing the panels from the bottom just to reach one panel in the middle.
Alternatively, a temporary mounting scaffold could be installed, which is of course also complicated/expensive.
As the number of panels and operational time increase, the probability of failure rises proportionally.
so what?
How do you solve the problem
(except if it has not arisen so far)
To get maximum capacity on the roof, the panels will be mounted almost flush against each other.
So the installation starts at the top, the panels are mounted row by row and pre-assembled accordingly.
Then the next row below, and so on, down to the bottom.
So far, so good.
But if you have to replace a panel (hail damage, contact corrosion, etc.) or just do a diagnosis, it becomes quite complex.
Stepping on them is not an option!
No one will want to start removing the panels from the bottom just to reach one panel in the middle.
Alternatively, a temporary mounting scaffold could be installed, which is of course also complicated/expensive.
As the number of panels and operational time increase, the probability of failure rises proportionally.
so what?
How do you solve the problem
(except if it has not arisen so far)