DHH-Sanierung
2023-10-20 09:57:49
- #1
Hello forum,
We are renovating a semi-detached house built in 1963 and want to achieve KFW70EE. For this, we need a U-value below 0.14 W/m2K.
For this, the roof must be renovated and newly covered. We have spoken to a few roofers and obtained quotes.
There are significant differences in the offers, depending on the insulation. The cheapest is 160 mm PUREN continuous insulation or comparable.
While some roofers swear by it, others advise against it. The supporters cite good insulation properties and easy handling. The opponents of polystyrene cite poor heat protection and poor sound insulation. Environmental friendliness is also criticized.
Now I have modeled the insulation once with the U-value calculator. My original goal was to experiment with which insulation combinations produce the best values for cold and heat protection. Because especially the poor heat protection was a thorn in my side, since an office is to be created under the roof.
Quite by chance, I then came across the fact that a continuous insulation with 160 mm Puren also has good heat protection if a still air layer is inserted between the rafters and 2 layers of gypsum board are installed underneath.
This construction would pretty much refute the argument of poor heat protection, and I actually like the insulation setup quite a bit. It is also much cheaper than wood fiber insulation, which is known for better heat protection.
Have I forgotten something?
We are renovating a semi-detached house built in 1963 and want to achieve KFW70EE. For this, we need a U-value below 0.14 W/m2K.
For this, the roof must be renovated and newly covered. We have spoken to a few roofers and obtained quotes.
There are significant differences in the offers, depending on the insulation. The cheapest is 160 mm PUREN continuous insulation or comparable.
While some roofers swear by it, others advise against it. The supporters cite good insulation properties and easy handling. The opponents of polystyrene cite poor heat protection and poor sound insulation. Environmental friendliness is also criticized.
Now I have modeled the insulation once with the U-value calculator. My original goal was to experiment with which insulation combinations produce the best values for cold and heat protection. Because especially the poor heat protection was a thorn in my side, since an office is to be created under the roof.
Quite by chance, I then came across the fact that a continuous insulation with 160 mm Puren also has good heat protection if a still air layer is inserted between the rafters and 2 layers of gypsum board are installed underneath.
This construction would pretty much refute the argument of poor heat protection, and I actually like the insulation setup quite a bit. It is also much cheaper than wood fiber insulation, which is known for better heat protection.
Have I forgotten something?