Waiving feed-in tariff, always feasible? Storage price?

Say, a balcony power plant. Who checks or notices if I operate four or five of them simultaneously? Does the grid operator really notice that immediately?

Does the road network operator notice if you drive 150 on the country road at night? ;-)

Tell me, a balcony power plant. Who checks or notices if I operate four or five of them simultaneously? Does the grid operator really notice that immediately?

What sense would it make (unless you also have backward-turning meters) to operate 5 balcony power plants of 600Wp each? :rolleyes:
Or are you mining cryptocurrency in the sun and thus have such a high "background noise"?

Charging an e-car, for example. The ones I saw had rather 480 watts. Possibly filling self-built storage. But then you would have to operate it as an island if the grid operator finds out otherwise so quickly.

But then you would have to operate it as an island if the network operator finds out otherwise so quickly.

He doesn’t notice anything at all. Operating several is possible, there are just a few details to consider. The current limits of these balcony power plants are chosen so that they can be used in all houses/apartments. If you have proper wiring and distribute them across different phases, it doesn’t matter at all.

He doesn't notice anything. Running several is possible, there are just a few details to consider. The current limits of these balcony power plants are chosen so that they can be used in all houses/apartments. If you have proper wiring and distribute them across different phases, it doesn't matter at all.

I suspect the same. The only thing I find missing is the purpose of running several. ONE balcony power plant nicely covers the basic power consumption of the refrigerator and other technology etc. But each additional balcony power plant feeds in without remuneration because it is registration-free.