wiltshire
2025-02-23 10:41:46
- #1
Yes, that is possible and everyone can individually assess the probability. The question is what that means for action.All known effects so far. No one really knows what we will know about it in 10, 20, 30 years. Maybe there are effects that we do not know today.
That is the consequence of uncertainty caused by nebulous thoughts about the future. Of course, we do not know what we do not know yet. There is a certain logic inherent in that. We also have the experience that we had to revise insights time and again. The question, as already asked above, is: what does that mean for decision-making? What do I hold on to? And here I find that adhering to the current state of science with some almost irrefutable findings and many very well-researched correlations is a particularly sensible approach. Now one can allow oneself a safety margin, e.g. I personally accept only 1/10 of the transformer’s radiation values. Since every limit value is subject to a kind of arbitrariness anyway, that is possible. Objectively, the decision does not necessarily become better because of that. But in the usual case, we want to live in our houses with a high quality of life, and latent fear is a poor advisor in that regard. So listen to your gut and if you always feel bad about it, simply don’t build. That is also a safe decision.If I would feel uncomfortable with it, I would leave it.