Tiling work bathroom - execution rather poor - appearance

Hello forum community,

I don’t know if this is complaining at a high level or justified annoyance.
We are only partly satisfied with the execution work of the tiler from the LP.

Here are 3 examples

1. WC pre-wall corner with Jolie rail untidy

2. Generally corners with Jolie finishing rail untidy

3. Decorative tiles frayed/chipped when cutting

A credit note is one thing, repair another. However, we are sure that the gentlemen tilers have already given their best here.

Does it make sense to even complain about this, or is everything within the so-called 'tolerance range'?

Regards
m

My tip: Have it redone. Your feeling does not deceive you. What does he actually do professionally during the day? Let's be honest, a bathroom has to be pleasing to the eye.....that would bother me, after all, he calls himself a specialist.

hm. don't know. These are already extreme sections, which may look messy in the cutout, but possibly do not stand out anymore or weigh less when related to the whole surface and then also fall within the tolerance.
For example, picture 1 the alignment... you would have to see it as a whole, that would then be picture 3. And I don't see anything there. I would rather criticize the planning that the largest bathroom area hardly gets any daylight.
The toilet's pre-wall: the picture from above, I wouldn't criticize that, but how the rail sticks out, that I would.
Picture 4 of 7, I would criticize that, but with some silicone or filler and a finger to smear it in, that is no longer worth mentioning. What is that anyway? Tile? Rail?
Overall, I do praise the sharp detail shots, but precisely these are deceptive, since you never go through life or here through the bathroom with a magnifying glass or macro lens view and these things probably really lie within the tolerance. But I am not sure either.

just now at breakfast we were still discussing the "picky nature of German builders" and that the introduction of Industry 4.0 in craft sectors arouses desires that cannot be implemented in practice. I see it similarly to Taking a step back, if necessary taking off your glasses ;) and looking at the whole thing casually. If there are still objectively defects (that are no longer within the range of A8 gap dimensions) just casually address the craftsman about it and look for practical ways to improve. I think the trade is far from "demanding dismantling"

I believe he will make it worse while trying to improve it. If there is furniture inside, you won't see it anyway.

So I certainly didn't want to overdo it, but the two spots where the metal strip protrudes might possibly be sharp-edged, so there's a difference between just the appearance not fitting and "safety," even though there's probably no significant danger from it. Maybe I'm just more particular in that area and more "generous" elsewhere, that could also be the case, so everyone has to figure that out for themselves.